1463
War never changes (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 176 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i think the real indictment is how we treat people who refuse to participate and die for the profit of the already rich; the government treats them with imprisonment while the rest of us treat them like a coward for standing up for themselves in thoroughly fucked up system..

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago

Yeah... That type of brainwashing is so commonplace now though. Just look at how the US is treating striking dock workers, people keep talking about how they make xxx,xxx and not how the ceos make xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx like it's the workers being greedy... 🥲

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

The keyboard warriors instantly became experts on labor negotiations /s, even though they seemingly haven't had the elementary realization that demands are movable in a negotiation, and you don't negotiate by saying "oh, I actually make quite enough money compared to poor workers in Alabama with no union representation and I love the current benefits thank you kindly, sir".

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's how you end up arguing whether any sick time is on the table and then the government steps in and says no sick time now back to work. Don't ask for just any sick time. Ask for fucking 2 months of paid leave for all workers and a $300,000 salary.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

During WWII in Britain, about 10% of the men drafted were sent down into the coal mines instead of being sent off to war. In addition to enduring the horrific conditions of the mines, they had to endure abuse for not fighting. For bonus points, the old-time miners would often haze these draftees by letting their elevator cages free-fall for a bit during their first trips down.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

There were also the Order of the White Feather during WWI in the UK (and I'm sure other variations in other countries at the time). They were women who would walk around and try to shame young men into enlisting, or they would present a white feather to men who weren't in uniform to highlight their "cowardice."

Some of the men these women gave feathers to were on leave from the front lines, or even home after being discharged from some horrific injury sustained on the front. My personal favorite: article.

[...] none more so than Seaman George Samson who received a feather when he was on his way to a reception held in his honour to receive the Victoria Cross as a reward for his bravery at Gallipoli.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 151 points 1 week ago

Hawkeye: War isn’t Hell. War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse.

Father Mulcahy: How do you figure that, Hawkeye?

Hawkeye: Easy, Father. Tell me, who goes to Hell?

Father Mulcahy: Sinners, I believe.

Hawkeye: Exactly. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them — little kids, cripples, old ladies. In fact, except for some of the brass, almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander.

[-] Klairabelle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I wish I could upvote this more, that show is amazing!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

Alan Alda's got a pretty good podcast now. I watched a lot of MASH reruns growing up. Feels strange that kids now don't have the experience of watching a bunch of stuff that's not made for them at all, just because that's what's on TV.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 134 points 1 week ago

"war is people that know each other but don't kill each other making people that don't know each other, kill each other"

I can't remember the author, but i love this old quote

[-] april@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago

Why do they always send the poor?

[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 36 points 1 week ago

Why don't presidents fight the war?

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I saw a picture of George Washington leading troops on a crappy boat. Why isn't Biden out on a crappy boat somewhere? Lol

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Because he wasn’t president then. Eisenhower led troops as did Grant

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

George Washington did lead troops one time as president, with the secretary of the Treasury at his side.

There was a little revolt over taxes on whiskey and when he showed up they surrendered.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Generals gathered in their masses. Just like witches at black masses.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago

I don’t really understand this seemingly widespread notion - that is also represented in this comic - that nations “agree” to go to war.

That is not really how it works most of the time, there is usually an aggressor and a victim. It is usually not two powerful leaders butchering their own country’s population, but rather one powerful leader butchering two countries’ population.

I know it’s not the point of this comic, but this really, really annoys me.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

I think WW1 was kind of like the comic. It was a bunch of squabbling family members who got into a pissing match and then sent their citizens to die. It never would have happened if Gramma Vicky had still been alive!

[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Sure, but this comic wasn’t made 100 years ago. It reeks of that “they should BOTH stop fighting!” rhetoric, that only benefits aggressors.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The world used to be more like the comic. Now it's more unilateral.

But the one important detail never changes.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

It's a pretty stupid comic actually. The conversation usually goes more along the lines of one nation demanding territory from the other, and the other telling the first to fuck right off.

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago

I in general agree with what you wrote, but the Israel/Iran brinkmanship does feel a bit like the portrayal in this comic at times. So the comic seems relevant to recent events.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Doburoku@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago

"War is where the old and bitter fool the young and reckless into killing each other"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago

It's close, but no, the first panel has more than one person

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Kropp, on the other hand, is more philosophical. He reckons that all declarations of war ought to be made into a kind of festival, with entrance tickets and music, like they have at bullfights. Then the ministers and generals of the two countries would have to come into the ring, wearing boxing shorts, and armed with rubber truncheons, and have a go at each other. Whoever is left on his feet, his country is declared the winner. That would be simpler and fairer than things are out here, where the wrong people are fighting each other.

- All Quiet on the Western Front

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] goatbeard@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago

Why don't presidents fight in wars? Why do they always send the poor?

[-] meliaesc@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Zelensky has done a fine job getting directly involved, imo.

[-] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Bc people are so stupid, they believe in nationalism and are easy to manipulate

[-] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

There are definitely some wars I'd much rather were just MMA death fights between the PM's and presidents.

And others where I'm glad they aren't, because the country whose victory would be best for the common good is led by someone who would not win a physical fight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FatTony@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Rich man's war, poor man's fight.

[-] Mio@feddit.nu 11 points 1 week ago

I have never understood war. Why a country want to attack another country. To me is it like I am free to move there so I have no need to attack them. You disagree, just walk away. They have resources? Stealing is not allowed so you can't do that. You dont own the whole world. No one will. War only leads to people die. No one should be happy about that. Yes, I cannot fight in a war. I would be a coward and flee to a better place.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm no politologist or military strategist, but I'm pretty sure a lot of wars (not all of them) are started so that a nation's government can get better control over their own population. If the state can declare an emergency situation, they can use it to justify cracking down on political dissidents, invasive surveillance, restrincting freedom of speech, etc in the eyes of the public. It can also be used to ramp up nationalism, which works in the ruling class' favour. Pretty sure this is at least part of the reason behind putin and nettanyahu stirring shit up right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Stealing is not allowed so you can’t do that. You dont own the whole world.

The problem is that everything is allowed, so they just do that.

Those who don't want to fight in some war - terrorize your population sufficiently and they'll obey, or you can keep them under propaganda pressure and they'll agree.

I would be a coward and flee to a better place.

What if someone wants to take your land, demolish thousand years old churches and fortresses and graveyards, kill all your countrymen they can, all that purely out of hate\envy and because they can?

Would you not want to kill some of those people? Would you not want to prevent such things happening.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Anybody ever play Advanced Wars?

I loved that game as a kid. But as I've gotten older, it's really sad to watch my CO be this kid with something to prove sending people out to die because Yay Kaboom Wippee!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] telllos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's a good summary of "all quiet on the western front".

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Politicians hide themselves away/They only started the war/Why should they go out to fight?/They leave that all to the poor, yeah/Time will tell on their power minds/Making war just for fun/Treating people just like pawns in chess/Wait till their judgment day comes, yeah

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
1463 points (98.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12237 readers
2089 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS