-50
submitted 3 weeks ago by ZK686@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

What bullshit. Putin was actively invading Ukraine in east in the Donbas region through all four years of Trump administration. source

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Get a haircut and mind your own business, you fucking weird con artist.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Lol. What an assclown

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

All this foreign interference and at the top we have Don-n-Boris going for the full timeshare lunch in Moscow.

I think Vlad convinced a lot of these high school idiots we elect to lead us that he’ll go nuclear unless he gets shit, and I think they all ate it up. And the money.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

What a fuckin' wanker.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

This moppy haired asshole that ruined England's economy?

Yeah I'm good taking advice from him.

[-] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So Ukraine should not fear a Trump presidency?

He gives a good answer but ignores what the guy has already said, basically doesn't address the GOP candidate's statements on wanting Ukraine to surrender or accept terms now, etc.

He was much tougher on Syria than the Democrat administrations.

This I never quite understood, but Obama was hamstrung by a GOP Senate on this. The GOP Senate (same majority leader) didn't attempt to retain his successor in the same way. So it's not a fair comparision.

Overall, reads like a rose-tinted and unrealistically hopeful take. Too much sugarcoating to be taken seriously.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Daily Telegraph (UK) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Daily Telegraph (UK):

MBFC: Right - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/10/03/boris-johnson-exclusive-interview-putin-trump-lockdown-echr/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] ZK686@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago

Lol...gotta love ultra Left Lemmy...it's so Redditish around here...

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
-50 points (10.9% liked)

politics

19132 readers
3966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS