“The public interest is not disserved by pressing pause here. This election season is fraught; memories of Jan. 6 have not faded away, regardless of one’s view of that date’s fame or infamy,” McBurney wrote in his decision. “Anything that adds uncertainty and disorder to the electoral process disserves the public.”
They'll appeal, but this is still a welcome development.
This is a good decision as it prevents some GOP fuckery, but part of me wonders what the point of the certification step is if it MUST be performed affirmatively without any inquiry. Doesn't it essentially become a rubber stamp at that point? Couldn't the step just be eliminated entirely?
Paywall just after this..
Poll workers would have counted the number of ballots but not votes.
What does that even mean?
Pretty simple, I think. Count the total amount of Ballots. The number of all candidates voted for should add up to the total amount.
That seems pretty idiotic to me. But I shouldn't be surprised by that either.
If you're going to count them again, at least count them properly and make sure the votes match too.
-deleted- Reply to wrong comment
Atlanta Journal-Constitution - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.ajc.com/politics/judge-stops-georgia-state-election-boards-hand-count-requirement/2IMHWOEUEJEI7KKUVLGLID73EY/#null
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News