755
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean after tucker spent an entire episode selectively editing out Kanye's antisemitic rants and then trying to portray it as a smear campaign by mainstream media.. why does anyone watch this moron still with the complete knowledge his stories are fully fabricated propaganda.

Tucker is a liar and a fraud. Of course he's also taking Russia money, probably saudi and musk money too.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes this, sure, but also he LITERALLY went to Russia, as they were invading Ukraine, and filmed some slop where he went into their supermarkets and walked around and said, "Hey... Now this is pretty fucking nice! They got broccoli and shit!"

It's so fucking naked.

[-] smokebuddy@lemmy.today 42 points 1 day ago

Their shopping carts have a coin deposit-return system! I've never seen technology like this before!!!

The best part was him saying that implementing this system in the US would fix homelessness - since homeless people use stolen shopping carts to carry shit around.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Jon Stewart made the remark

I’ve got this great house going on, but you know? This shopping cart looks pretty good.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think the thing that bothers me the most is he's like some university dandy whose dad married into inexaustible wealth who portrays himself as some cross between John Q Everyman, and Joseph Rogan. Impartial Journalist facade while directly taking RT money. Every aspect of this guy is a fraud,

Everything he says and does just screams "I am a fraud".

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Read a little deeper. Ever hear of Swanson dinners? Guess who his adopted mother is. His dad is the one who married into inexhaustible wealth, and he's been financially secure for most of his life, if not all of it. There are few people in America who could be less John Q Everyman.

[-] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just like Rush Limbaugh no one will ever think of him again when he's dead.

[-] iamanurd@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago

God damnit, now I’ve just thought of rush limbaugh.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Close, that was his dad, and that's why Tucker is the heir to the Swanson frozen dinner fortune.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

If only he'd gone away into obscurity after Jon Stewart got Crossfire cancelled.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The cadence is designed to hypnotize people. The people that watch him just accept it all as truth and probably have no idea how often he's been caught lying.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

In other news, grass is green and birds have wings.

But seriously, I don’t know how the American spy agencies have failed so horribly.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago

Wild to think that somebody born incredibly wealthy needs to do a lot of bullshit like this in order to make more money. He’s a true piece of shit.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

He doesn't need money, he's a little prep school heir from step mommy with a father that also spent his life grifting for the republicans. What he needs is validation. He needs to feel like people aren't laughing at him. But they always are, and they always will. Same with trump - That's why they are now hoping to kill enough of the other side so that the only people left in the room are the ones who are not paying attention except to clap when they hear "freedom" or "woke".

Seriously though, the truth is that trump is 80 and he will statistically die relatively soon. The same fear applies, "they aren't going to laugh at me". Give him a chance and trump will literally throw the match in the gasoline soaked world behind him on the way out, just for the comfort that he won't be made fun of in death or properly exposed in full context by history.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He doesn't need money

No but as I said in another comment he's a money hungry cunt. We all are to an extent but there comes a point of wealth for a small subset of humans beyond which adding zeros to your bank balance is what's fuelling you. They can't stop themselves.

He is one of that small subset IMO.

Seriously though, the truth is that trump is 80 and he will statistically die relatively soon

I can't recommend Mike Duncan's "The History of Rome" podcast enough. The cult of personality is what led to the fall of the republic and the similarities to our current predicament are more than a bit disconcerting.

MAGA and the idea of challenging elections by force will never go away.

Inherited money often comes with strings attached, too, limiting what the heir can or can't do with it. And of course they often develop habits that need money before they've actually inherited any, so it's not surprising when they beat their own path to wealth anyway - usually helped along by their birth connections and by the fact that people know they'll eventually inherit significant wealth.

Also, we seem to always make this assumption that there's some amount of money that satisfies the craving for money, when there are plenty of signs that the super-wealthy almost always want more money regardless of how much they already have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 day ago

Line must always go up. And of course he wouldn't use his own money to keep being on a show

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Of course Tuck is a Russian asset because he interviewed his Moscow boss, Vlad the Shit Stain.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Also Jordan Peterson, I feel like it's weird he's being left out of this discussion considering how many people lap up his bile

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah I laughed at his comment that Trudeau was "whiffing at a foul ball."

Reminds me of a scene from some old movie where they figured out if someone was a spy by asking them about baseball. Peterson failed that test LOL.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

This isn't news to anyone paying a modicum of attention, but glad those in power are finally stating the obvious...

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Statements like "This isn't news" are never helpful. Something like that is really just meant for you to performatively proclaim, "I actually knew this already!"

Plenty of people who aren't as enlightened as you are just now learning or just coming of age to be politically aware. Maybe they were in one of the various operating religious/political cults in the world today sheltering them from objective reality. Leave some room for them to learn something new and feel ownership in that new awareness.

Just literally zero value in "duh! Tell me something I don't know!". If anything, it risks derailing the enthusiasm building in someone who wanted to help who now feels "stupid" and "not in the club" so they get quiet. Something useful enough in the second half of your statement though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Specifically which influencers are directly working for Putin is new information.

[-] Defectus@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

They probably don't need a honeypot. He probably have enough skeleton to fill a walk in closet

[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago

Did Trudeau just watch the Putin interview? If you look hard enough, you can see Putin's dick in Tucker's mouth.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 24 points 1 day ago

The only reason this is surprising is because Carlson would be perfectly happy to do it without a paycheck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He is a political entertainer/whore and Putin’s useful gimp. What was anyone really expecting from this guy? A dissertation on the causes of economic injustice and inequity?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Is that Krieger from Archer?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

Thank you for posting this. It's important that government leaders point out influencers who are working directly for Putin.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tucker Carlson is the wonder spy Russians dream of eventually sneaking into the US presidency. Donald Trump is just the first step and likely too incompetent to serve their interests well. Frankly, I am surprised he was not Donald Trump's pick for vicepresident.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Does Carlson not say that? I was under the impression that that was his publisher at the moment

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
755 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3455 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS