449
He can stay in his sinking shithole .
Hey Putin, COME TO BRAZIL!
You just need his plane to make an “emergency landing” while on the way to somewhere else.
You would probably just nab a body double though. I doubt he leaves the country anymore ( except maybe for China ).
Brasil would have arrested him? Aren't they in BRICS?
As I feel the need to say every time it's mentioned, BRICS is made-up nonsense fabricated by Goldman Sachs to sell third-rate equities. Think about the relationship between the countries of "BRICS" and ask yourself if that sounds like an actual alliance.
It has become a diplomatic talking shop similar to the G7. There has been pushes from some member states to make it more, including creating alternate financial systems, but it has been slow growing.
Russia got all pissy with Kazakhstan just this week as a result of them not joining the BRICS
Nothing like fomenting trust in a global financial transaction system by threatening potential user nations.
BRIC~~K~~S
Turtalous growth because of the so many differences in political, economical, ideological between the participating countries which results in shitload of epic proportions
People care about the G7 because they have power and they sometimes agree on important things.
Neither of those are true of the “BRICS”.
China, India, and Brazil are all large countries with large economies, but I agree they don't have a lot to agree on.
This is intreresting. What is the connection between GS and BRICs? How does it help them sell equities?
GS diversifying and playing both sides? Just a hunch. G7 has the west.. whereas one could argue that the BRICS might evolve into an eastern bloc.
Sorry to say but “BRICS” is far from “made up nonsense” here in Brazil. There’s plenty of export and some industries that got a boost thanks to it, it’s a very real economic block. I don’t know why you would think that it is not real, especially now that we are setting up a payment system to avoid the dollar usage.
Sorry to say but “BRICS” is far from “made up nonsense” here in Brazil. There’s plenty of export and some industries that got a boost thanks to it, it’s a very real economic block.
Oh really? Let's take China, the biggest economy in "BRICS". Here is the history of Brazil's trade to China. It has of course grown (probably mostly soybeans). You might think that growth is thanks to BRICS.
But wait, what's this? Canada's trade with China has grown even more? Is it now BRICCS?
I don’t know why you would think that it is not real, especially now that we are setting up a payment system to avoid the dollar usage.
This is nowhere near implementation. Putin proposing something doesn't immediately make it real. It also assumes great stupidity on the part of China and India to tether themselves economically to the sinking ship that is Russia. India in particular is exploiting Russian economic weakness at every opportunity.
Doesn't seem that way when Lula proposes Putin's peace plan that only BRICS countries think is fair.
That doesn't mean much. Iran and Saudi Arabia also are in it and they hate each other.
I thought it was India and South Africa, not Iran and Saudi Arabia
It was, indeed. The group has grown a lot since then but the original name has stuck.
Ah, wasn't aware, thanks!
A lot more countries are being invitied to be a member of the intra fighting group known as BRICS.
Putin bruh is forcing other countries by implementing sanctions in ways such as by not accepting bananas and apples... 🍌🍌🍌🍎🍎🍎
That's interesting, guess i wasn't tracking that closely enough. Thank you!
TFW you realize countries outside NATO also have rule of law.
Yes and yes. What's confusing you here?
ICC rules only apply to Russia but not to Israel 🤡
Because America doesn't have principles it has investments and owners.
If you drop the because, I agree.
America is not a signatory to the ICC ( wonder why ). They are not the reason that Putin was charged or why Brazil would arrest him.
They came out against the ridiculousness of havimg a warrant for Netanyahu.
Awesome. Looking forward to the day when Netanyahu and Gallant also get the treatment. Come on ICC, put out the warrants!
They are unlikely to. Putin was charged with abducting children, not just killing people. And his invasion was unprovoked. And…..politics.
Maybe Biden can invite him to come talk in the states like he did with his good friend Netanyahu.
I'm curious how this makes sense to you.
Both have ICC warrants out for them for crimes against humanity. Only one spoke to congress, why not invite the other?
I didn't think Bibi actually had a warrant. I know they filled for one but I never saw it was issued. I can't find anything saying that it was issued or when.
Here's one form a month ago asking whether they would issue a warrant or not.
You are correct. The ICC warrant for Netanyahu needs yet to be approved by an ICC judge. For now it's only a warrant request.
US has a history of not caring what the ICC thinks though. Remember the Hague Invasion Act?
I assume that is their point.
Fucker should just die alone in a hole.
You mean like that
Same reason I didn’t go too
The ICC sent pooty poot to his room.
Kudos to Brazil to having balls, unlike Mongolia, and this despite being part of BRICS (unlike Mongolia which isn't).
Why is he so scared of Brazil?
Have you not seen the videos that come out of there?
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
449 points (99.1% liked)
World News
39050 readers
1138 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS