40
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml

A new vaccine provides hope for treating and even preventing the highly contagious and difficult-to-treat Clostridioides difficile infection, more commonly known as C. difficile or C. diff. In animal models, this first mRNA-LNP C. difficile vaccine was found to protect against C. difficile first-time infections and relapsing infections by inducing a robust immune response, promote clearance of existing C. diff bacteria from the gut, and even overcome deficits in host immunity to protect animals after infection, according to researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The results, published in the journal Science, will pave the way for clinical trials of the vaccine.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 12 points 1 month ago

That's pretty huge. C. Diff is a pain to get rid of and can spread very quickly in an inpatient setting.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Can't mRNA vaccine platforms be used to manufacture almost any organic molecule in the body?

[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep! The mRNA vaccine project started in the 1980's and to provide an elaborate use case, they designed it to be a "blank check". Meaning whatever disease, toxin, allergy, autoimmune disorder, or cancer researchers want to vaccinate against is likely possible.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So you could theoretically even make some ultra custom antibiotic that kills C.diff specifically. 😅

[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Well, vaccines are very different than antibiotics. While there was the first new antibiotic made in ages earlier this year that's highly selective for specific bacteria, it only works against gram-negative bacterial cells. C. diff is gram-positive and has been an issue for a long time. It's notorious for it's recurrence rate as it's great at surviving conditions which kill most bacteria. It infects 500,000 people each year, with 20%+ of them being a reoccurring infection. Since new antibiotics are very tough to engineer, a vaccine makes way more sense and it will provide treatment for half a million people annually moving forward!

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh yes I meant that of you can make any protein in the body, and you knew some super specific poison that only this bacteria dies from (unlikely), then you could make the poison in the body via mRNA, instead of teaching the immune system to target the bacteria, or making the poison in a lab. If say the poison was unstable, hard to keep from deteriorating between manufacture and administration, you could make it in the patient. Just an entirely hypothetical train of thought to check my intuition.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

A lot of antibiotics would require entire synthetic pathways in order to be generated which would be quite a feat to introduce in a safe way.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
40 points (95.5% liked)

Science

13259 readers
19 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS