625
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 5 points 57 minutes ago

Good. Qualcomm refuses to make it easy to run linux on their hardware. Instead they try to hide basic information about their processors and chips in the name of selling a license for every little thing.

[-] chasingtheflow@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago
[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 hours ago

While every comment here seems to scream "end patents", arm has less patent bs than other tech (rounded corners) meant to sue/prevent use. Arm works hard on developing and improving architecture and designs to offer licenses at a compelling price. Qualcomm paying as much as other licensees should be preferable to Qualcomm than bankruptcy.

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago

Yeah. The crowd rooting for Qualcomm has never worked with them

ARM has it's problems, but they aren't in the wrong here

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

Truly yes, but RISC-V.

[-] ravahn2020@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Just when ARM devices were finally getting good…

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 49 points 6 hours ago

Tech patents are ridiculous. Let's end them or reduce them to 1-3 years with no renewal. Then all that's left is the specific copyright to the technology, not lingering webs of patents that don't make any sense anyway to anyone with detailed knowledge of the tech. All they're good for is big companies using legal methods to stop innovation and competition. Tech moves too fast for long patents and is too complex for patent examiners or courts to understand what is really patentable. So it comes down to who has the most money for lawyers.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, but another big issue is that big companies can afford to bribe or buy out the patent holders in the first place. Ideally, the patent holders would benefit the most from everyone making their tech, but instead they benefit the most from one company being the exclusive manufacturer and highest bidder.

The act of an agreement asking a patent holder not to sell to other manufacturers in itself should be illegal.

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, making patents nontransferable would solve that. Ultimately, getting rid of most would be good, but if we have to keep them, then they should be dissolved if a company fails or is bought out because obviously the patent itself wasn't enough to make a product that was viable. So everyone should get the chance to use the patent. The whole purpose of a patent vs keeping tech proprietary until the product is released was to benefit society once the patent expires. Otherwise, it makes more sense for companies to keep inventions secret if they aren't just stockpiling them like they do now.

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 17 points 6 hours ago

Seeing things like "slide to unlock", "rounded corners", and "scroll bouncing" are all patentable is ridiculous.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 105 points 10 hours ago

A risky move... Or should I say... A RISCV move...

[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

You should say that, yes, very hopefully much so.

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 10 hours ago

"risc architecture is gonna change everything"

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 14 points 4 hours ago

It really did.

FYI, ARM stands for Advanced RISC Machines.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It actually did, but not in a way people expected at the time that movie was made. It changed a lot underneath the hood.

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 hours ago

Hack the planet!

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 47 points 9 hours ago

The amount of IP money grubbing in the IT industry is able to literally make millions out of sand, this is just more of it.

[-] mo_lave@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Not necessarily "out of sand". IP is basically putting a price tag on a person for them to say "Yes, I consent". In other words, technofeudalism.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

I may be off base but I think that might be referencing what the computer chips are made of....

[-] mo_lave@reddthat.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Think you're right lol

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 55 points 11 hours ago

This seems like a tactic that might win a battle but lose the war. Reminds me of Unity.

[-] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

What happened with Unity in the end? Did they back down?

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 40 points 7 hours ago

the fact that you know they fucked up but don't know how they fixed it says it all.

even if they did "fix" it, public opinion has been settled and nobody will trust them for awhile.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, iirc, at first they tried to downplay the change, then they paused it, then they walked it back entirely. I think that last step happened relatively recently, even.

But IMO the damage was done from just trying to alter the deal like that.

And, for me personally, I (naively) thought that ARM was an open standard. I opposed the Nvidia purchase because I thought they would do their corporate bullshit to kill off competition or for greed and thought that it getting blocked meant it would be free of corporate bullshit. This action makes it clear that it's already got some of that going on and ARM has been mentally re-filed to a spot beside x86 and its derivatives.

Though now I'm wondering if that's the whole point. Do some shitty corporate stuff so that the next time someone wants to buy them out, there isn't as much opposition and the current owners and C-suite can cash out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
625 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

58833 readers
5838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS