659

Summary

A video encouraging women to vote independently for Kamala Harris sparked outrage among conservative men, who called it divisive and “amoral.” The video highlights the gender gap that has widened between Harris and Trump, with recent polls showing notable leads by Harris among women and Trump among men.

Critics like Charlie Kirk labeled it “nauseating,” criticizing the wife for lying to “her sweet husband who probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life and provides for the family.”

Supporters argue it reflects real tensions around women’s autonomy, especially in conservative households.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Good lord they're really telling on themselves with this one aren't they?

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 31 points 22 hours ago

So it is "amoral" to tell women that they can make their own decisions. Thanks for clearing that up, Newt.

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago

I'm willing to take bets that sometime in the Future there will be a call from Republicans for a new law that allows husbands to see how their wives have voted.

To protect Family values.... And to stop disharmony in the marriage.....

And, of course, to prevent voter fraud.......

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

If the Conservatives had their way, women would not be allowed to vote at all. Unfortunately, that still seems to be one of their goals. I mean, Trump and his henchmen have already made sure that women are no longer allowed to control their own bodies, which I have to admit I thought was impossible in a Western country. What makes you think they're going to leave it at taking away women's right to a secret ballot? These people want to reverse advances in civilization like women's right to vote all together. That's what conservative means to them: back to the Middle Ages. In this sense, they are little different from other religious extremists such as the Taliban. Their goals might be a little different but their means are pretty much the same.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

If conservatives had their way, men would vote on behalf of their wives and unmarried adult daughters.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I can't imagine (as a unmarried guy) living in a marriage where my wife would be afraid to tell me who she voted for. Even if she votes Trump, she's my spouse, and that comes way before that. She should chew me out if I make her feel afraid.

...It makes me feel shame for the culture some men are raised in.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago

I don't know. If my wife voted for Trump she knows I'd leave her, so I can imagine she wouldn't tell me if she did. Not to mention she'd have to have been lying about her entire personality the whole time we knew eachother XD.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I’d you’re married to someone who has opposite political views than you , your marriage probably has a lot of issues and voting secrecy is way down on the list. You don’t need to be perfectly aligned but mostly.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Depends upon how extreme the differences are. Arnold Schwarzenegger - who's a moderate Republican (thankfully supporting Harris) - was married to Maria Shriver from the infamously Democrat-heavy Kennedy family for well over a quarter century. Bill Clinton's (in)famous campaign adviser, James Carville, had been married to a well known Republican counterpart (Mary Matalin) since the early '90s.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 23 hours ago

At this course, the US Taleban is about to meet the handmaid's tale...

[-] nobleshift@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

..... and this kids is a great example of why you should support encryption.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago

This is why you should know who you marry before you get married.

Stop letting regressive religion control your lives.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago

Religious people typically enforce their oppression with abuse and violence.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago

Critics like Charlie Kirk labeled it “nauseating,” criticizing the wife for lying to “her sweet husband who probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life and provides for the family.”

And just why does she have to lie about it to her "sweet" husband?...

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life

Yeah, she probably sits on her ass all day anyway. The kids raise themselves! The audacity of these women to have been born with an ungrateful vagina smh

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

My wife would beat the shit out of me if I didn’t vote for Kamala, and I’d deserve it, and enjoy it.

[-] Lemmy_Cook@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

More like rotten

In a functioning democracy, a vote should be secret by default, and that should be the social expectation. If you wanna tell people, sure, but not in a way where your actual vote can be proven.

[-] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 256 points 1 day ago

“If your husband is mad at this ad, then this ad was made for you.”

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

I'm mad that it's 2024 and this ad needs to exist

I'm mad it's 2024 and we need to check notes

Make sure women don't have rights stripped away

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

And I'm just mad that it's 2024!

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Right? The 20th century ended almost a quarter of a century ago. So mad.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago

What about the husband vote cancelling out the wives vote?

Both humans have agency. If you are going to frame the issue as treachery, then the husband shouldn't vote against his wife. Or, is the husband owed two votes and the wife none?

Fuck that.

[-] Un4@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago

They believe if you do not earn money or earn insignificant amount then you do not deserve to vote or have a say in politics. You can estimate their thoughts and actions based on this simple starting point.

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yokels voting for Trump be like "Yeah I'm earning the 5$/h so I make the big decisions in this House!"

[-] gerbler@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Or, is the husband owed two votes and the wife none?

To conservatives it's this one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 231 points 1 day ago

That's so weird that the nazi husbands who would give their wife a black eye for voting for kamala would fly into a rage about something.

It's bonkers that the people who can't stfu about FREEDOMS are the ones who want to strip everyone else's away

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago

Waiting for the article from the NYT about how this is bad for Harris' polling with police officers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

they cannot say they did not see it coming after the loud royal fucking theyve been crowing about for so long

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago

Critics like Charlie Kirk labeled it “nauseating,” criticizing the wife for lying to “her sweet husband who probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life and provides for the family.”

These idiots really miss the fact that most women can, and, in fact, must work. This idea of a "sweet" husband who works to provide for his family is so outdated it's absurd.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sooo if you're a potential husband with a penis, vote for Trump for the following reasons:

  1. Guaranteed husbandry or at least fatherhood. Just go out there and fuck someone, they gotta have the kid no matter what. Your cum is valuable.

  2. Ah yes. You think I forget? You can grab them by the pussy....if you're famous. So go out there, fuck somebody, be famous and grab them by the pussy!

3)Earn a second vote. You heard me right. You can't incriminate each other and therefore her vote is your vote.

Now go out there and vote! Vote Trump! Fight the enemy within. It's just not right! Bikini at the pool and allowed to vote? Heck no! Women should be prepared for being attached to a 4x4 in the bedroom permanently for the sole purpose of making love to the man. And sometimes for having babies, but hurry up with that, and don't feed babies breast milk at the park. And those naked things that happen in California the gay, Oregon and the independent country of Washington State, those gotta go!

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 15 points 1 day ago

You fucking imbecile. If women are locked in the bedroom how can they make dinner?? Moran

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 139 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., joined the criticism Thursday, telling Fox News that Democrats are telling wives to lie to their husbands: “What kind of a totally amoral, corrupt, sick system have the Democrats developed?”

Ah yes, the guy who has cheated on multiple wives is talking about amorality and corruption.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

He's not the only conservative paragon of virtue that's having a hissy-fit over it either:

Fox News host Jesse Watters said on the air last week that if his wife did the same as the women in the ad, it would violate “the sanctity of our marriage.”

“If I found out Emma was going into the voting booth and pulling the lever for Harris, that’s the same thing as having an affair,” Watters said, a remark that prompted many online to call him out for his marital affair, which he admitted to in 2018.

[-] neoman4426@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago

Not just an affair, an affair with his current wife he was calling out. Who he started the affair by being a massive stalker and letting air out of her tires so she'd ask him for a ride.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 110 points 1 day ago

Awww your wife isn't your property?? 😢

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 73 points 1 day ago

The guy who helped create the ad even says

“They took a person’s sanctity of their ballot and turned it into a conversation about men owning the behaviors of the women in their life,” Pagitt said. “And like, well, I didn’t think you were going to make our point for us. We’re very grateful that you did.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gatorgato@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago

Yes. Yes, rage against this. Feed your anger. How dare they?!?!?! Feed the Streisand effect. Spread this idea. Let it engage you!! Oh, I know. Rant about it to your wife. Tell her all about this evil idea. Tell her what those other independent women are doing. Yeah. Get good and mad /S

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago

That headline again: "Party of Snowflakes Melt"

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago

This is the Bear vs a Strange man all over again and they still don’t get it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
659 points (98.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
4032 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS