-6
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

One time I accidentally said a kid's name on a 2-way radio, and we were not supposed to use their names over the airwaves.

I'm not sure if I had critics thought, it was just a mistake

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago
[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

wtf does this even mean

OP is asking two things:

  • the most controversial shit that you say
  • the shit that you say and think "mmh, maybe I'm wrong but I'll keep saying it"

...or at least that's how I interpreted it.

[-] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 56 minutes ago

I read it as these two questions:

  1. Which controversial sentence said over public broadcast media do you disagree with the critiques of?
  2. Which controversial broadcast sentence do you come closest to agreeing with, even if you don't think it true and hate yourself for even contemplating as true

Don't know if I'm right or but that reading makes most sense to me after a couple of passes and some thinking.

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

How could anyone perceive it any other way?

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

As you said in the other comment, the sentence is grammatically OK¹. However, it's still a huge sentence, with a few less common words (e.g. "utterance"), split into two co-ordinated clauses, and both clauses are by themselves complex.

To add injury there's quite a few ways to interpret "over the airwaves" (e.g. is this just radio, or does the internet count too?)

So people are giving up parsing the whole thing.

I also write like this, in a convoluted way², but I kind of get why people gave up.

  1. I'm not sure if it's semantically OK due to the word "utterance".
  2. Except when translating stuff, since I'm forced to roughly follow the "informational layout" of the original. That's usually a PITA but it helps wonder for clarity!
[-] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It reads like a question simultaneously sent through google translate and a thesaurus. I've tried several times, but I just cannot work out what I'm being asked.

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

And yet it's both grammatically and semantically correct.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

My most controversial discourse* can be roughly phrased as "screw intentions", "your intentions don't matter", "go pave Hell with your «intenshuns»". It isn't a single utterance*; I say stuff like this all the time, and regardless of the utterance used to convey said discourse, people will still disagree with it.

The one that I'm sometimes at fault is "people who assume are pieces of shit and deserve to be treated as such". Because sometimes it is reasonable to assume (to take something as true even if you don't know it for sure); just nowhere as much as people do.

*I'm being specific with terminology because it's a big deal for me. "Discourse" is what you say, regardless of the specific words; "utterance" is a specific chain of language usage (be it voiced, gestured, written, etc.)

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
-6 points (33.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26669 readers
1658 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS