2024 Election Ballot Measures: Abortion, Immigration and More (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Everyone is so caught up in the President and Senate races, it's worth looking at key ballot measures.

The amount of states that don't know it's already illegal for non-citizens to vote is too damn high!

Arizona - Right to Abortion. Yes 61 to 39
Colorado - Right to Abortion. Yes 62 to 38
Florida - Right to Abortion. No 43 to 57 - Needed Yes >= 60 to pass.
Maryland - Right to Abortion. Yes 74 to 26
Missouri - Right to Abortion. Yes 52 to 48
Montana - Right to Abortion. Yes 58 to 42
Nebraska - Right to Abortion. Too Close To Call.
61,000 votes remaining, "No" is +21,000
Nebraska - Prohibit abortions after 1st Trimester - Yes 55 to 45
Nevada - Right to Abortion. Yes 64 to 36
New York - Right to Abortion. Yes 62 to 38
South Dakota - Right to Abortion. No 59 to 41

Alaska - Repeal ranked choice. Too close to call.
111,000 votes remaining, "Yes" is +4,000
Colorado - Ranked Choice. Too close to call.
762,000 ballots remaining, "No" +247,551
D.C. - Ranked Choice. Yes 73 to 27
Idaho - Ranked Choice. No 70 to 30.
Missouri - Citizen voting, ban ranked choice. Yes 68 to 32
Nevada - Ranked Choice. No 54 to 46
Oregon - Ranked Choice. No 60 to 40
South Dakota - Top 2 Primary. No 65 to 35

Idaho - Citizen voting. Yes 65 to 35
Iowa - Citizen voting +17 year olds. Yes 77 to 23. Kentucky - Citizen voting. Yes 63 to 37
Missouri - Citizen voting, ban ranked choice. Yes 68 to 32 North Carolina - Citizen voting. Yes 78 to 22
Oklahoma - Citizen voting. Yes 80 to 20
South Carolina - Citizen voting. Yes 85 to 15
Wisconsin - Citizen voting. Yes 66 to 34

Alaska - Increase Minimum Wage. Too close to call.
114,000 ballots outstanding, "Yes" +31,000
Arizona - Decrease Minimum Wage. No 75 to 25
California - Increase Minimum Wage. Too close to call.
7.1 million ballots left. "No" +390,000
Massachusetts - Increase Minimum Wage. No 64 to 36.
Missouri - Minimum Wage + paid sick leave. Yes 57 to 43

Florida - Legal weed. No 44 to 56, needed Yes >= to 60 to pass.
North Dakota - Legal weed. No 53 to 47
South Dakota - Legal weed. No 55 to 45

Arizona - Border Enforcement. Yes 63 to 37
Arizona - Eliminate partisan primaries. No 58 to 42

California - Marriage rights, repeal prop 8 - Yes 61 to 39

Connecticut - Absentee Voting. Too close to call.
473,000 ballots remaining, "Yes" +174,753

Nevada - Voter ID. Yes 73 to 27

Ohio - Citizen Redistricting. No 54 to 46

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The rejection of ranked choice is just stunning to me...

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

It's really easy to convince people that "different" is worse, it seems.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

In Colorado, both the republican and democratic party came out against RCV.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Of course they did. For them there's nothing to be gained and everything to lose. The only way ranked choice happens is if it's shoved down the throats of the GOP and DNC.

[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Not listed here, but California voted against outlawing slavery for prisoners.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Note on the one that I know, Massachusetts was only a change to the minimum wage for tipped workers. (And I'm sad it failed). The restaurant industry spent solid cash on this.

Edit: also in MA was the right for Uber drivers to unionize, and that looked like it passed last I checked.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

So many rebuttals of ranked choice. Insane.

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

I know in Colorado the rank choice was bundled with an all candidate consolidated primary. I think there was too much change in one bundle, each one would have done better as it's own ballot initiative.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Kentucky also voted NO on a proposed constitutional amendment that would give the state legislator power to siphon funds from the public school system to give to private schools.

Small victory in spite of everything else, but a victory none the less

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024

24 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19244 readers

1872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News