169

Judge cancels court deadlines in Trump's 2020 election case after his presidential win (apnews.com)

submitted 5 days ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 83 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is infuriating.

Nothing has changed re: Trump's status as a regular citizen, and the DOJ's memo only applies to sitting presidents. The DOJ and Jack Smith were prosecuting criminal conduct. In winding down these cases now, they are voluntarily refusing to prosecute someone they believe is a criminal when their role was to do so on behalf of the people. Likewise, the judge is voluntarily abandoning his duty to expediently seek justice on behalf of the people.

The proper course here would be to continue to treat him as a regular criminal, not delay anything, and on January 20th, decide then if you want to quit.

This preemptive compliance is doing 90% of Trump's work in creating an authoritarian state where he is above the law. Don't just roll over, you hacks, do your jobs.

[-] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 24 points 5 days ago

There's actually a good video by Legal Eagle on this issue. Basically if they keep the cases open, the new DOJ can dismiss the case with prejudice in January (since it will be impossible to finish the case before due to appeals processes and similar), and if they drop the charges without prejudice, the crimes will be past statute of limitations in 4 years, so it's impossible for trump to face any consequences now. But if they stop the prosecution now, at least they might have a chance to do a concluding report a la the Mueller report just better, documenting the crimes and evidence. It's shit but theoretically the best outcome possible now.

[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The problem is it's not clear who could enforce a judgment on him. If DC police tried to arrest him, they wouldn't get through the door. Him being president makes it very difficult, as a practical matter, to actually punish him in any way.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 58 points 5 days ago

He fucken got away with it

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

So said we all. We knew he wouldn't face justice.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Assess the situation?!

The president is not, nor should, be above the fucking law. Where are the checks? Where are the balances? This country was literally founded on this idea (among many others)! Set the right precedent and put this fucking crook in jail!

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

In 1776 they definitely would be checked. We lost our way. Money outweighs principles. Money was important back then, but it wasn't above (known) principles. We did have slavery and suffrage. It would be nice that those did not exist in our history. But those are eventually changed.

This crap is not what we were founded on. The Republicans are not patriots. They are cowards.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Ignore the fact that after 1776 people tried to make George Washington King and the only reason we didn't have a king now is because Washington turned it down in favor of a huge portion of the gdp.

People really need to abandon the mythology that the founding fathers were incredible thinkers with profound morals compasses when most were drunken criminals with some good ideas in-between objectively horrible ones.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

That's a niche fact that "some" wanted him to be a king. And that he was the only one to design the structure of government. A congress was seen as an unrealistic possibility and that a king could be better. So it's just a huge what if. That didn't even happen.

The founding fathers has principles. They had separated to break free from their oppressive leaders and create their own system. The Republicans have exploited this system and leveraged it to promote the worst possibilities.

It's not beneficial to all citizens and they are sad people that will ruin the world if they are not stopped.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Principles that we know are flawed, like slavery, owning your wife so on so forth. It's mythology dude they were fucking messes.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If the rule of law doesn’t apply to him then does the rule of law apply at all? It makes it all seem meaningless when you look at it.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 30 points 5 days ago

This just further cements that there are multiple different levels of law depending on your money/wealth/power/influence. Any normal individual does this, with this much proof, and they would've seen the inside of a jail cell before the cuff-marks faded away.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Always has been, always will be.

Clavell's novel Noble House woke me to this. It's about the English occupying Hong Kong and the drama between them and the Chinese, the cultures and economies.

This Chinese dude is bitching about the fucking stupid English notion of "equal before the law, rich or poor".

"Why else would I strive to be rich if I'm to be treated as a peasant?!"

Much to think on there.

(Clavell wrote the Asia Saga books, starting with Shogun. I highly recommend them.)

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

America: running for president is the get out of jail card, because all levels of government are afraid to be seen as partisan/political

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 days ago

Guys guys....I think we have a loophole. We can crime so long as we have a PAC and run for president.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

It may be unethical to parden yourself, but the founding fathers didn't make it illegal so....

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

This isnt the last word. Smith is working out "the appropriate course for this case", and the judge is giving him until Dec 2. We will hear from him again, before Trump takes office.

He's a smart guy, he may figure out a way to make these last few months interesting.

[-] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 5 days ago

Nothing will happen. I appreciate the optimism, but you’re kicking your acceptance further down the road. If they were actually going to hold the fucker to account, they’d have done more by now. At this point? Attempting to prosecute the president-elect just weeks before he steps into power to ‘save America’? That’s just giving the conspiracy nuts validation to start shooting.

He’s got you by the pussy I’m afraid.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

All I know is he's smarter than you or I am. I have no illusions that Trump will ever get what he deserves, but I'll at least wait to see what actually happens in that filing before raging.

[-] Makhno@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

All I know is he's smarter than you or I am.

You must have bananas for brains

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

OK, Smith is smarter than anyone in this comment chain. Are you a fucking angry child?!

Bet you could do better than a highly educated and experienced hard-ass like Smith! Why don't you give his office a call? Offer your wisdom?

[-] spector@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

The Friday news dump returns.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024

169 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers

1435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News