963
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Yay can't wait to lose my insurance

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

When they spoke of mental health care instead of gun reform they meant they would take care of those with mental health concerns by simply eliminating the concerns.

Ie. Camps and culling.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

They will get what they deserve

[-] Loce@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Nah, somehow it'll be Biden's fault... google backfire effect, the more you challenge their beliefs the more they fight for them, even when proven wrong. They do not learn. They will not ever learn. They do not want to learn.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

No they won't. That's a big reason why they never change.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Tell them it's all good, the GOP is only aiming to repeal Obamacare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

I have a feeling this channel is going to get a lot of content in the next four years...

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

LAMF != selfawarewolves

It's not LAMF unless the consequence they're bemoaning is precisely the thing they intended to impose on others, not expecting it to be imposed on themself, too.

It's very obvious said Trump voter wasn't seeking the ACA to be taken away from only certain others (they clearly recognize that it doesn't work that way), so no LAMF.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 8 months ago

No. Completely fits, including as per the definition outlined in the sidebar. Leopard: "I eat faces!" Trumpanzee: *votes for the Leopard* Trumpanzee after the election wondering: "He's not REALLY actually going to eat our faces, right?"

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Didn't they have control of the House and Senate last time and still couldn't get it repealed before? Do they have the votes to get rid of it this time?

Assuming they get rid of it, assuming Trump actually steps down in 4 years, and assuming we ever have another election (big ifs, I know), could this actually help Democrats for the next few election cycles?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
963 points (98.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7281 readers
201 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS