275
Remember all those ads about Kamala Harris being soft on crime?
Then remember how Trump won and pardoned a bunch of violent criminals?
To them they aren't criminals, they're white patriots and political prisoners. That's the core problem.
Most Americans seem to be too soft on crime, since they allowed a criminal to become president.
Crimes are ok now. I'm planning a few myself
Amatuer, I've been download cars all this time.
Man, I've been watching people in movies kill Nazis my whole life. I will resist.
Criminal is a matter of perspective when your president is a felon.
Pepridge farms remembers
The most egregious Jan 6th case is Trump.
Interesting taking the approach of "most important cases first" now. What were they doing, calling them in by last name?
Honestly, this whole thing has been a fuck up.
Biden never should have made a republican the AG
This practice of appointing Republicans to critical positions to demonstrate bipartisanship has got to stop. (If the Dems ever get another chance, at least)
They won’t stop it.
We'll never have the opportunity agajn.
Getting sent to the camps might stop them.
I’m guessing it was prioritized by the amount of evidence, and the chances of getting a conviction.
It's been four ducking years, should have been plenty of time to prosecute everyone, including Trump
Right ? They’re writing like it was this January and they’re rushing to tidy up.
In prison for poisoning you
This has been one of the worst justice departments.
The worst justice department so far.
Starting with Merrick Garland
What a complete failure
Which is also failure of Biden. The old man just could not keep up with the shifting of the tides; every play he's got came from 30 years ago.
Stfu.. Not even close what are you 15?
To be clear trumps was far worse. But its exactly that point that makes Bidens so bad. Trump shouldve been arrested day 1 for inciting an insurrection. Barr shouldve also been arrested, he was literally convicted of criminal contempt of congress and was supposed to be in jail the entire time. The assassination of Epstein and his ties to both Trump and Barr needed investigating. The Attorney General, the Justice Department, are the authority on enforcement of law, and there just was none for Bidens tenure.
Like the Fucker that goaded all these assclowns to come to capital?
Why? So that they're officially convicted so that Trump can pardon them?
They'll all be pardoned. It's a waste of time unless they go after Trump himself.
I understand the feeling of pessimism, but let's not forget who Trump is.
Unless pardoning them directly and immediately benefits him, he's quite unlikely to give a shit
Plus they'll still be on record as having been convicted of a crime. They may be legally exonerated after a pardon but their names will still show up in a search--probably make it more difficult to find a job.
A presidential pardon is an admission of guilt.
...and then what? He still becomes president und zero justice will have been served.
Yeah he is going to pardon all of them. I guess DC doesn't have "state charges" that can't be pardoned.
So they can get pardoned? It’s worth it nevertheless.
The most eggregious Abu Graib soldiers on the pictures. Not DJT/leadership though.
Good for you!!! 👍🥳🎉🎈🍾🥂🎯
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
275 points (98.6% liked)
News
23284 readers
1604 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS