45
submitted 1 week ago by NENathaniel@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago

I'm gonna take a guess without watching and say:

Because freight company CP owns the lines people use riding Via.

And the various governments for decades have done nothing about anything to make rail better.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago

Actually, Canada is a leader in high speed rail studies.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

Our studies are exemplary.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You should see our UBI studies! We've got studies coming out our fucking ears.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean we have at least two study trials, Mincome in Manitoba in the 70s and the Ontario Basic Income Pilot Project in 2017 (though that one was cancelled after a few months due to a change in government).

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So that's "no, not really." At least, that's my understanding, also.

Could definitely use more sustained for a reasonable amount of time, that much I'm sure of.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I may be wrong but I recall learning somewhere that the recent rail project used the UK and Australia as a study for it. Neither of these countries are known for amazing high speed rail. Why didn't we look at Japan, France, Spain, or other countries that have world renowned high speed rail, high ridership rates, and good frequency?

The the time to build this rail was decades ago, lets use some of the most successful examples to study so we can catch up and build a modern system instead of building something that is already outdated.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

VIA operates on CN tracks in the west, but that doesn't negate the overall correctness of your statement.

They're always late because they don't own the infrastructure and have to take a back seat to their "landlord's " schedule.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

The way to get the highest score in railroad tycoon (classic game) is to prioritize the mail and passenger trains. Government could pay CN to let VIA prioritize traffic.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Ugh. Why did we ever privatize rail. People would riot if we privatized the highway network, and yet...

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Because the rails were there before Canada!

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

When were the railways ever not private in Canada? One barely solvent passenger service that's a crown corp hardly constituted nationalized rail.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Wasn't it originally a huge public undertaking? It was my understanding that the rails and CN began their lives in public ownership before being privatized.

Did I misunderstand things?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The railways were built privately for the most part, and eventually most of them defaulted on loans and became CN. Which I guess was public for a long time, but competed with a number of private operators still like CP. Via was a heavily subsidized passenger crown corp because nobody could make passenger service profitable.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
712 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS