286
Abstractons (lemmy.ml)
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 13 points 23 hours ago

Who's Jane? This is Fedora the Explainer.

[-] _pi@lemmy.ml 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It's windows host because it has the unique property of leaking to higher levels of abstraction and leaking to lower levels of abstraction, which is a technological feat that can only come from Microsoft.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

inb4 it's actually some microcode change introduced to intel management engine

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 day ago

TIL go is an interpreted language and runs straight from source code!

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

obviously the shell script compiles the executable every time the image is run :)

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 72 points 1 day ago

Docker, no docking!
Docker, no docking!
Docker, no docking!

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 day ago

deploying docker-compose to production

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago

Wait, by docking do you mean... docking?

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Backup, backup....

[-] traches@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago

People don’t actually do this, right? Docker inside docker inside a VM inside another VM? On windows? Right????

[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 23 hours ago

I've ran Docker in LXC in a KVM before. I used LXC to have multiple containers on a VPS. Then I had to run something that works best with Docker, so I stuck Docker in an LXC.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure docker recommends that it runs under WSL when on windows.

[-] dan@upvote.au 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Windows itself is technically running in a VM if you have Hyper-V enabled (not quite that simple, but that's a reasonable approximation). Hyper-V is a type 1 hypervisor which means it runs directly on the underlying physical hardware, and both Windows as well as any VMs you create are running on top of Hyper-V.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Oh that's an interesting tidbit, didn't know that

[-] traches@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, docker in a VM makes sense. Docker in docker in a vm in a vm though?

[-] Matshiro@szmer.info 5 points 1 day ago

Yep, can confirm

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

I've seen docker inside a VM before but that was just a dev box for testing

[-] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 23 hours ago

That's the most reasonable part of the image

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

Are you not losing loads of performance by stacking vms like that?

[-] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago

Using Docker in a VM on a Hypervisor is industry standard, using docker inside of docker may be okay for CI purposes but I wouldn't do anything more than that in production if it's not necessary.

The stack from the image above (Windows>WSL> Docker>Minikube>Docker>App) is something you'd use on a dev machine (not a "real", production-like test environment), in which case you don't really care about the performance loss

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 16 points 1 day ago

That's super standard for actual infrastructure

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

Isnt that exactly what minikube is? Kubernetes in docker.

I've used docker-in-docker images, but its usually not fun.

[-] groet@feddit.org 33 points 1 day ago

Could also be a hyper-v layer around Windows "host"

[-] akkajdh999@programming.dev 32 points 1 day ago

You know how much layers there are under hello.go?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

There are even layers within the hardware layer. :)

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 day ago

and of course at the lowest level the particle interactions are all calculated by cueball using rocks in a desert

[-] elidoz@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago
[-] bloubz@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

There are even several layers of transistors. And several energy layers of the electrons

[-] BruceLee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Dora s'appelle Jane en anglais ?!

[-] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

Non, Dora s'appelle Dora en anglais. The meme is just weird.

[-] bloubz@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Non. Et effectivement Jane ça ferait moins latina. Tous les autres stéréotypes sont là pour apprendre l'espagnol

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
286 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32501 readers
488 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS