88
submitted 1 year ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Days before the Americans were released, Republican lawmakers in Washington blasted the deal, saying it amounted to a “ransom” payment and will only encourage Iran to imprison more foreigners.

The families and some former hostages say the Biden administration had to use the leverage it had available to secure the freedom of the imprisoned U.S. citizens, or face the prospect of the Americans staying incarcerated indefinitely.

A graduate of White Plains High School in New York and a business consultant with degrees from Tufts and Rutgers universities, he was arrested in 2015 and convicted of espionage in a trial that only lasted a few hours.

As a first step in the prisoner exchange, the five Americans were placed under house arrest Aug. 10 with their release contingent on the transfer of the $6 billion in frozen oil revenues from South Korea to Qatar’s central bank.

Iran’s use of the released funds will be overseen by Qatar, and restricted to the purchase of food, medicine or other items for humanitarian purposes as allowed under U.S. sanctions.

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, however, told NBC News' Lester Holt in an exclusive interview that Tehran will decide how to spend the $6 billion.


The original article contains 877 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] InactiveBeef@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I guess we know now that each person cost about $1,200,000,000

Still better than Reagan's deal to swap hostages for weapons though

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe one or more of them were spies and their intel was worth that much

[-] detalferous@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

I thought the US government had a policy against paying ransoms. But we did it with the basketball player in Russia, too This will come back to haunt us because it clearly communicated to terrorist organizations (even if they are governments of foreign nations) that the US will pay you if you threaten enough citizens.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 8 points 1 year ago

Iran is a sovereign state. If we fear their actions, we use diplomacy, not indefinite detention of their people. This isn't Al Qaeda or ISIS or something.

[-] nimnim@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago

This has happened before: Iran has taken American-Iranians hostage and demanded a ransom. A Democrat president paid the ransom and justified the payment somehow to silence those who opposed giving in to a terrorist regime and funding their activities.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
88 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2539 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS