708
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The same week his state outlawed racial discrimination based on hairstyles, a Black high school student in Texas was suspended because school officials said his locs violated the district’s dress code.

Darryl George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, received an in-school suspension after he was told his hair fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes. George, 17, wears his hair in thick twisted dreadlocks, tied on top of his head, said his mother, Darresha George.

George served the suspension last week. His mother said he plans to return to the Houston-area school Monday, wearing his dreadlocks in a ponytail, even if he is required to attend an alternative school as a result.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

abolish dress codes

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Is there a definition of what's "legal" and what's "illegal" in terms of hairstyle?

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Well in Texas there is something in the books about the legality of hairstyles.

The incident recalls debates over hair discrimination in schools and the workplace and is already testing the state’s newly enacted CROWN Act, which took effect Sept. 1.

The law, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots. Texas is one of 24 states that have enacted a version of the CROWN Act

So the school suspending the student because of his hairstyle would be considered illegal under this law.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

Nice haircut actually.

I personally just wore a messy Hagrid-like heap of hair being 14-15, some teachers didn't like it, but I didn't care. They did take offense, though.

[-] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Who gives any kind of shits what a students hair looks like?

Why do these draconian dress codes still exist?

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Sexism and racism.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

violated the district’s dress code

hair fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes

I'm sorry, but WTF? Are they mandating everyone dress like skinheads or what?

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

I assume just the boys. Girls can probably have longer hair... as long as it's not in a "harlotous style" or some nonsense like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Let's hope that the rest of the school takes on the same hair dress, just for support.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Usually schools will have an uniform but this was just his hair and most likely a more stereotypical white or Asian style probably wouldn't have this issue.

[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

To conservatives, a real American is a white person with white eyes and blond hair. Anyone else is inferior.

This is why I hate the term "African-American". We don't call white people "European-Americans" while we call black people "African-Americans" as if they're not American enough.

It's sad.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
708 points (96.6% liked)

News

23360 readers
1917 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS