[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Get seasick and vomit in less than a minute… 🤢

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All of those judges, attorneys and critics might end up in jail when big orange comes into power again. You just have to listen to his „Project 2025“ agenda.

And nobody shall say they didn’t know what they were electing…

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Soon there will be a law to change her name automatically into "Marie-Louise Straight", so that administrators will be happy.

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Head of the Batman Research Institute at the Harvard School of Comics.

32
Ich👵iel (lemmy.world)
[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

How brainwashed could someone be…? - Yes!

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

It’s like thinking about marrying your ex-wife again, just after you went through an awful divorce, that took years to get accomplished, which you had insisted in. It would make you look somewhat stupid and the question is whether your ex-wife would let you move back in to your former house (i.e. the EU). Who knows…

You wanted it, you got it, now live with it!

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I really don’t think that Mastodon needs influencers. It’s just normal people talking about normal stuff. Don’t need any “I‘m so glorious, and here’s my product that will make you think you’re glorious, too” kind of influencers there, thanks!

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What is actually the definition of “financial freedom”? Having (earned / gained) enough money, so that a person has no need to go to work anymore? If that’s the case, I would expect that number to be much, much lower than 50%.

EDIT: sorry, I just read it in the article. If “financial freedom” just means to work and live more or less without having to worry about financial obligations and what will happen tomorrow, then less than 50% is a rather shocking figure.

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

WTF?! „… force browser providers to create the means to mandatorily block websites present on a government provided list.“

Today it’s some terrorist / pedophile / fraudulent site, tomorrow it could be some opposition, news or whatever could be disliked site on that list.

138
Ich🛥️iel (lemmy.world)
[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Es gibt noch was anderes auf Feddit?

31

I have been looking in settings, but somehow I can’t find a setting to show link previews for URLs instructions instead of just a copy of the title with a frame around it.

If that is not a feature yet, I would like to request it. All other Lemmy apps I am currently testing show link preview, so the Liftoff timeline looks kinda weird.

Other than that I really like the clean UI design!

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess they thought it’s one of those porn sites…

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the old Reddit times when you had some random nudes here and there while browsing through the “all“ sub / timeline.

I don’t think that’s a problem and should not happen when you tailor your subscribed communities accordingly or choose to blur / filter NSFW.

view more: next ›

TheProtagonist

joined 1 year ago