218

Something is broken.. I know it.. (lemmy.ca)

submitted 10 months ago by OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 16 points 10 months ago

I've had this with Rust once, t'was a weird feeling.

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

I have that with Rust quite frequently. At least a lot more often than with any other language. I love it!

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I think it's just because rust doesn't let you make many of the mistakes that'd normally lead to runtime errors

Pair that with rustcheck in your ide and the only errors you'll see will be ones you define yourself

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Exactly. Love it!

[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

An old phrase that's stuck with me over the years, although I forget where I heard it:

I like it when my code works first time. It's like Christmas, but less often.

[+] eldavi@lemmy.ml -9 points 10 months ago

i start everything i do w chatgpt and it's twice given me a dummy function/method that immediately worked and this was my reaction both times. lol

it shipped both times and not even the senior guys caught it in any of the peer reviews before it reached the clients; it's been almost a year for the first one and they're still happy w it. 🤷

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

That's called dumb luck.

[-] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago

I mean, chatgpt can easily create basic code without issues.

But as soon as you desire something more it might fall apart and then there is where dumb luck comes in.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

these were somewhere between basic and difficult, which is why i start with chatgpt; it's gets you past the basic part more quickly.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

very much so and it's painted my impression of the people who have SO MUCH more experience and talent than i do; since they're expected to catch & correct it.

it's also helped me immensely when i pointed out to them that they missed its implicit insecurity after our peer reviews and i'm know that it pissed some of them off.

[-] expr@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

Reviewers are not infallible and are largely focused on the meat of the MR rather than every single detail.

It reflects much more poorly on you than it does on them.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024

218 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

38584 readers

384 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml