12
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eskimofry@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Must be a sysadmin who wants time alone with his server.

[-] colderr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago
[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

My head canon is that he knew there was an update available to fix it, he just wanted to get away from the other astronauts. I might be biased having spent the day hiding from my family.

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

I love the totally illogical idea of self-destruction in space travel.

Like we don’t have self-destruct bombs on ships or planes or research stations on earth (I’m sure there’s an exception or two, but they prove the point), why the fuck would we have them in space, which is a much more fragile environment to exist within..?

Computer shutdown procedures sure, but what possible use is a bomb that’s made to blow up your own vessel? Just so silly.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Didn’t German u-boats get sunk by their crew rather than allow that tech to get into the hands of the Allied powers?

I would think self destruct is the same concept.

[-] jagungal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Many naval vessels have been sunk by their own crew rather than be captured by the enemy. It's called scuttling.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

"Uh, captain, we were joking. You don't need to stay on the ship... and neither does Daniel."
*hushed whispering, quick discussion*
"Well okay, we think Daniel should stay."

Scuttling purposes or of its far enough in the future/sci-fi enough you might not want the data/object surviving if you can't have it

[-] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I always though the point was "This is secret/must not be given to the enemy" so destruction is a better option than having it seized

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

That would make sense for a cutting edge spy plane, but it's a little weird for something like the Nostromo, which is just a standard cargo ship. I guess if you sometimes carried secret cargo, though, you would want that equipment standard, since otherwise installing it custom for one trip would be a dead giveaway that there was something secret on board.

[-] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

My other thought behind it was also not necessarily that it is it's own device/explosive but more so along the lines of "we will intentionally run this poorly to cause itself to self destruct." Akin to running a car engine untuned and without a radiator then full throttling it.

Someone may have just developed a program that tells the engines to do that so you wouldn't exactly need anything physically installed to have it work.

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, I mean, anything you need a spacecraft to do but that you can accomplish without adding extra equipment, you should probably do it that way, because it means less mass to accelerate and less equipment to test and certify and so forth. It's definitely not hard to imagine getting this functionality without adding equipment. The question is whether the ability to do this in the rare scenarios that call for it offset the drawbacks of having a system in which the protections against such failures can be disabled. Which means you then have to include a bunch of interlocks and crap to ensure it's as unlikely as possible that the ship can get into that mode without someone being very sure they want that. I think OP is probably right that on, say, a cargo ship, it's pretty unlikely that "also, the engine can explode!" would be seen as a feature rather than a wholly alarming bug.

[-] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'd assume there are those safeties and interlocks, you'd always want that, a thumbdrive with a program that disables it is just as easy and not a "bug" which is what I was getting at. But yeah, it's unlikely most cargo ships would want that probably. I'm simply playing devils advocate because they do seem to have them, so how or why in the most reasonable sense is all I'm arguing.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

12796 readers
1607 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS