49
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chillinit@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

If the goal was reduction of food waste (instead of profit) then all of these businesses would be giving away the food instead of selling it at a reduced price through a middleman.

[-] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

If that were the goal of the companies selling the food, sure. But I think the app does a good job of connecting food that would normally be thrown out with people who cant afford much. The corporation gets a dollar or two, the people get to eat. I understand that it's not as pure as giving it away for free, but the majority of these companies would not give it away but will do this, which I see as a net good.

[-] chillinit@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, that's some neolib bullshit.

This is a for profit business facilitating the profit of other business while targeting the most disadvantaged. It's another capitalist middleman.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Speaking as a user of the app, I'm grateful it exists, it's saved me thousands of dollars and made it a lot easier to survive in an expensive city.

[-] chillinit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'll not find fault with the poor for choosing what's been made practical for them to choose.

I'll keep pointing out capitalist nonsense so we can collectively create a world where you're not worried about the cost of food anymore.

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Used this a few times. Pizza place will give you a box full of left over slices for like $3.

Problem is, I think some businesses are using it to draw customers. I get asked occasionally "want anything else while you're here?" and I worry that they're making extra food just to give out on the app.

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

You mean like a loss leader?

Really depends on the discipline of the consumer.

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The problem is that the point of the app is to reduce food waste by selling extra food at a discount.

I think some of these people are just making more food intentionally so that they’ll have something for the app. There’s a perverse incentive where not having extra food at the end of the night means fewer customers.

The lost revenue on the discount sale of extra food can be less of a disincentive than gaining extra customers can be an incentive.

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's like the cobra issue in India which is from Perverse incentive.

The basis of all of this issue is simply that things required to live are either too expensive or the income is too low. (Or efficient distribution is too difficult)

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I have the app. I dunno if it helps with food waste, since the places I've gone wouldnt have thrown it away, but sold it in discount anyways.

Regardless, I found it as a cool way to buy discount donuts and bread.

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

I tried it. They are lazy, to specify what you will get (I want vegan food), if you are lucky enough to book an offer.
Not so popular here.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5393 readers
215 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS