25

Joe Biden regrets having pulled out of this year’s presidential race and believes he would have defeated Donald Trump in last month’s election – despite negative poll indications, White House sources have said.

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland as attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection while presiding over a justice department that aggressively prosecuted Biden’s son Hunter.

With just more than three weeks of his single-term presidency remaining, Biden’s reported rueful reflections are revealed in a Washington Post profile that contains the clearest signs yet that he thinks he erred in withdrawing his candidacy in July after a woeful debate performance against his rival for the White House, Trump, the previous month.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

But of course he would think that. 🙄🙄

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean he might have, a lot of people that voted for Biden in 2020 did not vote for Kamala in 2024 for various reasons. Trump did only very slightly better in 2024 than be did in 2020. Would the people who stayed home and didn't vote for Kamala have gotten out and voted for Biden? Maybe. If anything though Biden should have dropped out sooner or not ran at all, the DNC should have fielded better candidates, instead they spent 4 years (longer) trying to strangle any progressives before they could become feasible candidates.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Joe Biden who showed up in 2020 would have beaten Trump. Joe Biden in 2024 is not the same guy.

The only real asset Joe had over Kamala, though, is a penis. For some voters, though, that's enough to make them pick one and not the other.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

A lot of people who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 spent the next four years getting poorer.

Kamala lost because she promised to be four more years of the same thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Sour grapes. There are no guarantees he would have won, and the propaganda machine would have played almost exactly the same tune it did for Harris. Eggs, israel, gas prices, too old…

People stayed home. That’s why we got trump.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Not sour grapes.

Pure fucking delusion and narcissism.

We all watched the debate. There was no coming back from that.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Hey as long as we are talking about regrets Joe, how about regretting going for a second term when you said you wouldn’t?

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hell, he might be right (I doubt it but you never know). BUT better than either of those options would have been if he'd announced by 2023 that he would not be running for reelection (like he campaigned on!) so the Dems could have had a full field and competitive primaries. That would have given them the best chance to win (but would they have? kinda doubt that too).

I DO agree with his understatement that his Garland decision was a mistake. Not just a mistake, a disaster!

[-] ghen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

He could have stepped down in 2022, given Kamala his last two years, and she would still be eligible for two more terms after that. She would have had incumbency, experience, and a younger face than the oldest guy who ever ran for president.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garlandas attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection

At least that part is fair

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's been absolutely appalling how long it has taken to prosecute Trump.
Many cases should have been ready the second he was no-longer president.
All the lame considerations about looks and not getting involved is idiotic. if the politicians in power don't work to defend democracy, who else should?
The left have been screaming for Democrats to wake up for more than a decade, but they behave like a party with dementia that doesn't understand what's going on around them.
As AOC has stated multiple times, people will come to vote for you, if you give them a good enough reason for it. Harris was the better more moderate candidate. But I think most Americans want more, they want real change. Like better healthcare, environment protection, democracy etc.
Preventing a fascist narcissist becoming president apparently wasn't enough?!

But maybe I'm wrong, maybe the majority of Americans prefer to live with the danger of not receiving healthcare, and the danger of being financially ruined by healthcare bills. Rather than living in a "socialist hellhole" where society actually care about the citizens?

The number one cause for bankruptcies in USA is healthcare bills.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Remember how there was already a document produced by a special prosecutor that said there were crimes committed but a sitting president couldn't be prosecuted? Just fucking memory holed by Garland's DOJ. He literally could have taken that up the day he was confirmed.

[-] toddestan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd say his first mistake was choosing Garland. Biden then made a second mistake when he didn't immediately fire Garland as soon as it became obvious that Garland wasn't going to do his job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Biden: "I'm a one term president, stability in crisis."

Biden: "I don't care, fuck it, you only live once, I'm running again!"

People: "You said you were a one term canidate, you're old, you didn't do COVID well, you broke up strikes, you aren't protecting women's rights, trans people are under attack, Mexicans are still in cages at the border, Ukraine could use more help, you're doing a bad job at stopping weapons to Israel, rent is gone up, inflation is stopped bu not down, groceries are still expensive..."

Biden: "Shut up Jack, check this out!"

["Primaries" give him the win, flops at debate, hands things to Harris]

Biden: "Well I did what I could do. ...I would have won anyways, why be consistant with what I say and do? Now lemme pardon my son after I said I wouldn't."

[-] Yewb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Of all things the pardon of his son is reasonable that guy had a whole culture of assholes trying to find anything to get him in jail just to hurt Biden.

Then we find out the basis of the entire hunter controversy was a lie and the guy admitted it was a lie after the election.

So they ended up getting for like tax evasion I would be willing to bet 90% of congress would be guilty of similar things if brought under the same scrutiny.

[-] WilderSeek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He likely would not have won. It surprises me how discrepancies in this election haven't been questioned, but at this point it may not matter. As for his choice of Merrick Garland. Yeah, that and not really doing much about unseating DeJoy was a mistake.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago

Citizen United says President Biden would not have won.

[-] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That dementia would probably won over him.

[-] vikingr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I just don't understand why Biden's family and those closest to him wouldn't have taken the time to be like "Joe, just shut your mouth. Cement your legacy as one of the best Presidents the USA has ever had, make some shit for Donald harder on the way out, and enjoy retirement."

Instead he's showing his whole ass. And for what? Once real history gets memory-holed by the fascists none of his whining matters anyway. He could have done a lot of good on his way out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Not a chance in hell.

It does highlight how out of touch those in the gerontocracy are, however.

[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Mr. I’m only gonna be a one term President seems to have a short memory, yet again.

Him and his staff misled and dragged their feet about his intentions early in then he went full out with ‘no I’m gonna run fuck you all’ and it turned into a disaster.

This is just one of the problems with the current Democratic Party. No one will work with and groom the upcoming young members to take control. The older party members literally do not have a clue what it means to step aside for the good of the party and the good of the country.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I wish this comment was higher. Biden betrayed the party and its chances of defeating Trump the moment he won the 2020 election and chose to not start preparing the nation on Jan 20th 2021 for a younger generation to lead. Merrick fucking Garland was the other, related, and just as large mistake. That one is totally on him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This ghoul was propped up in 2020 with the full force of the party and then won thanks to covid, but he thinks he's some hero. Democrats lost in 2024 in large part thanks to him. Fuck you biden, you racist, genocidal, and power-hungry piece of shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Copium: The Final Frontier

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

For an ancient venal egotist like Joe, the fact that Kamala lost is close to a best case scenario. He would've gotten completely waxed if he had stayed in... but now he gets to say he was forced aside by the party leaders (Pelosi, the Obamas etc.) and that is completely verifiably true, but he also gets to claim he totally would've won, which is very likely not true, but now we will never know.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He could have defeated medicare too.

Seems like this is his way of arrogantly throwing Harris under the bus for his own historically low ratings, starting back in 2022 after Roe was lost. Theres no way he could have done better than Harris. With him running it would have been an even bigger blowout. He seems to think he could run a genocide against his parties wishes and then go on to win an election. Its idiotic.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Might've, might not've. It's irrelevant now, of course.

What Biden and Harris will be remembered most for, is their peaceful transition of power to a mentally unbalanced fascist tyrant, knowingly, compliantly, without even any public statements of caution.

Biden and Harris are ready to quietly shake hands with Trump and Pence, hand them control of everything, after then retire to a quiet life of luxury and highly-paid speaking engagements, where they'll continue the Democratic Party's proud tradition of speaking without really saying anything.

And so the toilet flushes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

On the bright side, centrists are getting split between Biden and Kamala.

Let them bicker amongst themselves for once. The rest of us can unite for once.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm reading the WaPo article it's based on and guys this is some pure grade bullshit. They start with 5d Chess; then they say people were unable to hear about his victories because of the media, they were unable to appreciate the best Covid recovery in the world; and yes, he claims he could have beaten Trump.

It's an incredibly flattering article for a man who was so far out of touch he called outrage over inflation the best recovery in the world. Yeah they managed a soft landing, but that shit didn't trickle down. We're on our second year of record breaking increases in homeless people. We don't give a goddamn shit about the stock market when we're shopping for used Recreational Vehicles to use as our primary housing. If families are choosing between utilities, rent, and food, then your Bidenomics message is going to do worse than fall flat, it's going to blow up in your face.

And the whole style over substance thing. Just holy shit batman, he broke the strike of workers who were (and are still) massively abused. He did that on prime time television. And then he negotiated for the office worker parts of the unions to get improvements and it's a complete submarine. Not only did he do the bad, he did no PR damage control, not even to show what little he gave the workers after he shut down their strike. At one point in the WaPo article someone mentions that Biden tried to run the country like it was 1972, and I agree with that statement.

Which brings us to the crux of his sins as a leader. He was unwilling to listen to the people he was supposed to be leading. At every turn he decided that he and his high paid advisors from the corporate world knew better then the people actually struggling. He might have thought he was playing 5d chess but he was losing at checkers... badly.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

best Covid recovery

It is very appropriate if they're framing COVID as a purely economic issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"Benedict Arnold" developed a clear connotation over time. The same needs to become true for "Merrick Garland". History will remember him as a coward beyond measure and a key to enabling trump's final push to end American democracy.

Fuck Merrick Garland, without exception.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

And fuck Biden for picking a Republican as AG.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Garland made a lot of sense in theory. Obama had picked him first and he had been denied his likely singular life's goal by obstructionist gop with trump egging it on. He should have sought justice for this country, while feeling the cathartic release of righting his personal wrongs.

But he didn't, because he's feckless and an absolute waste of that historical moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Okay grampa, back to bed.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

A fool to the end. A Zionist, genociding, hubristic fool until the end.

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, all the problems left of fascists have with Kamala were even moreso with him. The only way Democrats could have won was to hold a fair primary which they haven't done in a long time. They needed to get people voting for a candidate and not against the other guy which has been the strategy of both parties for ages, but doesn't work well when one side has people voting for him and your side actually wanted to vote against you, but were never given an alternate.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
25 points (82.1% liked)

News

23786 readers
1213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS