22

When I use a public jitsi instance am I really putting my privacy at risk?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's all relative.

More private than Google or Meta? Hell yes.

Suitable for whistleblowers and journalists reporting war crimes? Nooooo.

But Jitsi you can run it yourself and you should.

Understand that the public instance is provided freely as an alternative to Google and Meta, and whilst I agree encryption should be the default - it does add overhead for something probably running on donations.

[-] PuppyOSAndCoffee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago
[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Short answer is yes, Long answer is by how much depends on tos and what keep and use, and really what you consider risk.

Before things were relatively mild, picture your jitsi meeting is a public cafe with a security cam. Someone would need specific info to see you at the cafe or get footage from the cafe owner. Now with ai training anything said or displayed could be used as training. Voice, speech patterns... Its a wild scale best to find reputable companies or selfhost

[-] dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizza 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, kind of. I doubt they analyze what you say on it but they could do it, technically.

I would recommend using a self-hosted instance if you can, it's very easy to set up with docker.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)

Privacy

31601 readers
412 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS