910
submitted 1 year ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

Not to forget the third category: dumb luck

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

It's the right half! (Dumb people getting rich without head start is incredibly rare)

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Behind the Bastards covers a few of them. IIRC Dr. Oz grew up poor and went to medical school on scholarship.

He's not fuck you money rich like Bezos or Musk, both of which lucked into the birth lottery.

Though tbf, Oz got rich by scamming people out of their money with endorsing supplements that don't work.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Becoming a surgeon and serial scammer sounds like he lacked morals not intelligence.

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

morals are a flaw on an individual level and only remotely beneficial in the context of greater society, intelligence is something you can never have enough of.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I agree there should only be two categories, but I think "birth lottery" should be a subset of "dumb luck," not the other way around.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I cannot think of many dumb people who got rich by themselves. Unless they win the actual lottery instead of the birth lottery

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Dumb luck" doesn't imply the person is dumb, just that the quality of their decision-making had no bearing on their success. Even geniuses can have dumb luck.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless they win the actual lottery

Not only overwhelming most of lotteries winnings, while looking good to us bareass paupers, are pittance compared to wealth of people who are rich, but also people winning lotteries lack the foundations rich need to remains rich (second chart) and usually lose everything pretty fast.

[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That's what's the original says. It was made back in 2011

[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Probably because luck actually plays little role in being rich. Without luck those born rich will still be rich. With luck those born poor will still be poor.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You don't have to rely on luck if you can afford to buy a bunch of lawmakers and a Supreme Court or two. It's amazing how many "smart businessmen" rely on a bought and paid for justice system.

[-] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Thing is, you obviously can become reasonably wealthy by following the first chart, if you're talented and 1 in 10 thousand lucky, whereas the second chart has a significant success rate.

The mega rich are too weak-willed to concede they've essentially hit a 1 in 60 million Powerball. Winning the lottery warrants glee, not pride.

Billionaires all exploit the working class—or at the very least they all inherently rely on its occurrence, without exception.

I'd add a third slice to the second pie: steal your way there.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I'd add a third slice to the second pie: steal your way there.

That is expliotation of working class

[-] rustyricotta@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

To make the odds in your favor even worse, all your competitors have an existing fortune and ARE exploiting the workforce. Good luck 👍

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

Read a study earlier that stated that the majority of high corporate execs are most likely psychopaths

[-] minyaen@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Are you sure it wasn't sociopath? It does take a certain amount of decision-making lacking empathy or remorse.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I think it's the other way around: only psychopaths can become corporate execs

[-] xelar@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

The youngest billionaire becomes one after inheriting a fortune.

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If that's not pulling yourself up by the bootstraps, well then I don't know what is.

[-] bali10050@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The „merciless exploitation of the working class” is not how they get rich, but how they keep their wealth. If you're poor, you can't really exploit the working class. It's basically just birth lottery with a really really small section for the people with luck and/or hard work.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 1 year ago

If you're poor, you can't really exploit the working class.

Scammers from across the planet have entered the chat.

[-] coolie4@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If you're poor, you can't really exploit the working class.

Of course you can. It's called turning to crime. Most pimps, low level drug dealers, etc, aren't rich.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

You just listed service industry workers

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

If you’re poor, you can’t really exploit the working class.

Tell that to the po-lice

[-] gsymon@mstdn.social 7 points 1 year ago

@Confidant6198

Hmmm... I think you could squeeze in tax-evasion and money-laundering.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

You first need something to evade or launder.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would split the second into thirds and add a "Lying, cheating and stealing" slice.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
910 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

53678 readers
909 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS