115

Speaker Kevin McCarthy sent his House members home for the week without a clear plan to avoid a looming government shutdown after hardliners in the Republican conference once again scuttled his spending plans, delivering an embarrassing floor defeat for GOP leadership for the second time this week.

The Republican leader slammed his far-right flank for wanting to “burn the place down,” after conservatives dramatically bucked McCarthy and GOP leadership on a procedural vote over a Pentagon funding bill, throwing the House into total paralysis. And now, members are not set to return to session until Tuesday as the possibility of a shutdown at the end of next week appears ever more likely.

“It’s frustrating in the sense that I don’t understand why anybody votes against bringing the idea and having the debate,” McCarthy told reporters.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

All he has to do is work with the Democrats. That's it. He's just not going to do it because he is clawing on to his speakership for dear life.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

And even there, he could hold onto the speakership by working with Democrats. If he throws the Democrats a few bones in exchange for them voting to keep McCarthy in any speakership vote, then the power of the Freedom Caucus would be blunted.

But silly me, the obvious path forward is really to keep doing the same thing and hope that the Freedom Caucus will become reasonable. Surely, that will work perfectly, right?

Mmm… he knows that everyone on the other side of the aisle fucking hates him.

That said, considering how often and consistently Republicans have outright lied to their colleagues and pulled bait-and-switch bullshit, maybe it’s time to just say they’ll back him for speaker after the vote, and then just… vote for Jeffries instead.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Of course, it doesn't help that McCarthy pushed for a Biden impeachment on the grounds of "the Freedom Caucus wants this even though there's zero evidence" only for the Freedom Caucus to decide that wasn't enough and they wanted more.

The Freedom Caucus are acting like spoiled kids. "I got you the new toy you wanted so now you'll act nice to mommy and daddy, right?" "NO! I now want these two other toys! Get me them NOW!"

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, Dems should vote their conscience and stand back and let the Republicans figure it out. The Republican party has openly and consistently obstructed everything Democrats have tried to do for the last 20 years at least, including assisting with trying to throw the 2020 Presidential election. Democrats don't have to stoop to that level, but they also damned sure aren't obliged to rescue the Republican majority in the House when one part of it is obstructing the other part.

[-] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 39 points 1 year ago

"Sent home for the week" fuckin jackasses. Keep working on it until it's done, these short work schedules for our representatives are dumb as all hell

[-] An_Ugly_Bastard@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Say what you want about Pelosi, but she would keep on working till they got the job done. McCarthy is speaker in name only.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

McCarthy is speaker in name only.

Which is fitting when you consider he never wanted to do the job in the first place. He only ever wanted the title.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Lock them fucking in until they figure the shit out if they haven't gotten the votes within 3 weeks of the deadline.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

The republican philosophy on governance has always been “The government is ineffective and wasteful; vote for me and I’ll prove it.”

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago

Republicans are clowns. They don’t want to do their jobs so bad that they’re obstructing each other now. McCarthy is bad enough. These “hardliners” are lower than dogshit.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

He got here by giving crazy people what they want and now he's confused as to why crazy people aren't being reasonable? Welp, these are your people, some might say the fact that you don't want to burn it all down just makes you a RINO.

Oh man that sucks bro yikes wow oh man...

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


House Republican leaders are sending members home for the week amid deep divisions over funding the government ahead of the rapidly-approaching September 30 deadline, according to multiple GOP sources.

House Republican leaders are running out of options after conservative hardliners sunk a Pentagon bill from advancing on Thursday and the fate of a GOP effort to keep the government funded remains uncertain.

The procedural vote’s failure marks yet another blow to Speaker Kevin McCarthy as he faces a major leadership test and threats over his ouster and Congress inches ever closer to a potential shutdown at the end of next week.

Days of negotiations have yielded a few apparent breakthroughs, but McCarthy’s Republican opponents have been quick to throw cold water on progress and openly defy the speaker’s calls for unity.

Late Wednesday evening, McCarthy briefed his conference behind closed doors on a new plan to keep the government open – paired with deeper spending cuts and new border security measures – in an attempt to win over wary members on his right flank.

As part of the deal, Republicans told CNN on Wednesday night that they have the votes to move forward on the yearlong Pentagon spending bill that five conservative hardliners scuttled just Tuesday, with Reps. Ralph Norman of South Carolina and Ken Buck of Colorado indicating they will flip to a yes on the rule and will vote to advance the Department of Defense bill Thursday after the speaker came down to the spending levels that Norman had been demanding.


The original article contains 738 words, the summary contains 253 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
115 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS