19

Hi I wanted to know if anyone here is using Standard Notes (https://standardnotes.com/) as their daily driver for taking notes.

Is it fully open source (the server and the client)? How well does it work for note-taking?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kipo@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

I did for a while but they made it such a pain to use it that way, so I ditched it and went back to Joplin.

For example, Standard notes was working fine, then one day an update broke my self-hosted setup. When I finally fixed it (it took days), I noticed the editors I used no longer worked either. I got tired of fixing and fighting to keep it working.

Joplin's editor sucks (on mac), but at least the app reliably stays working and syncing.

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

I used to use Standard Notes for a while (didn't self-host the server) but for various reasons switched over to Joplin, syncing the data between devices with Syncthing.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

So i see that they have a premium version and that the code is gpl. So are the premium features in the repo? Can i make my own build that gives me the premium features free?

[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

idk 🤷🏻‍♂️😳

[-] tiz@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I remember hosting server option was somehow paid.

That’s somewhat my reason for I decided to go with Joplin

[-] Shimitar@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

My solution is Silverbullet.md on web, syncthing + native markdown editor (Markor on Android). - yes sincthing is still very well alive on android, there is at least one android client still actively developed AFAIK.

Because Joplin is (IMHO) slow and does not store notes in plain markdown but its own format, even if it's called .MD, it's not markdown.

Also, silverbullet.md is really something unique, worth trying even if a bit more nerdy.

[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I looked at it and did some reading of others experiences, and it looked like a huge pain. I opted for Joplin and haven't looked back. I self host Joplin server for sync via docker and it's rock solid.

I love that the client is available on any platform. Is the client a little ugly, and clunky? Yes, but for me it's not so ugly and clunky that I'll give up a fully open source self hosted e2ee notes solution.

I've been self hosting Joplin in some form for something like six years. Once a year or so I scope out the other options and as of yet I haven't found another notes solution that I'm willing to switch to.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Joplin is a better way to go.

[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Too bad the UI sucks and it doesn't have a WebUI.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The premise is to enable local-only storage. It's more secure. Joplin has backends for storing your contents securely elsewhere, and has transaction control, which is the same difference as a WebUI.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

45329 readers
223 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS