222
submitted 5 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

To be clear it will "require" a new cable to push at that max (8k/120fps?)

It's not like you need a new cable just because a new TV supports it.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You kinda do though. It’s like the difference between Cat5 / Cat5e / Cat6. Physically they all have the same Pin outs, but the tolerances vary greatly. Could you get 10Gbps on Cat5? Possibly, but only over short clean distances. You can do it more easily on Cat6, even though they all plug in together. The HDMI cables are the same way.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Somebody - probably those guys thinking how they'll sell more stuff, - is operating in reality where "you can, but you shouldn't" can't be said in human languages.

I've been reminiscing parts of my childhood where I'd watch a lot of karate matches and try to repeat moves (I know it sounds stupid). The fights, the lights, the room, my grandma, the summer evening outside matter in these memories. Not how much logical dots there were on that goddamn screen.

One of the most depressing things about now is how, even compared to 10 years ago, people are thinking not about new things to do with tech, but about doing old things with more resources wasted, because that's apparently better.

1920x1080 seems an overshoot sometimes. 8K - why the hell? And with more expensive shorter less reliable cables, other things equal.

I guess hoping for cheap thin LPD displays is useless.

[-] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Resolutions higher than fullHD are useful not only for TV in front of your sofa. You need 8k (and even higher) to VR-helmets. Also there already are cinemas with giant displays instead of projectors. Don't be a retrograde.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Don’t be a retrograde.

I already know that launching stuff to the orbit this way is more expensive, but there are situations where a retrograde launch makes sense. Mainly of military nature.

I refuse to accept other meanings of the word.

Also there already are cinemas with giant displays instead of projectors.

Tool for the job. For me instinctively a projector and a screen seem to be a better solution than a humongous LCD display. But if that's cheaper (how in the world though), then let them do as they want.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Ehh, can I get the Basic Low Speed HDMI Cable with Wifi?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
222 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

71448 readers
2871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS