13
Well well well (slrpnk.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bigfish@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago

Congestion pricing is such a good idea everywhere there is rock solid public transit alternatives. Where there's not, it just becomes a tax on the poor.

[-] Cycle0861@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Can you explain congestion pricing?

[-] Bigfish@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

Think whole road tolls you can change based on a schedule, or based on current and expected traffic. All of it is meant to either disincentiveize driving to cut down total traffic, or at least shunt it to less congested times or roads.

Aside: I 1000% don't consider individual toll lanes to be a type of congestion pricing. Those are just convenience surcharges (looking at you too TSA Pre check) and are complete elitist bullshit that hurts everyone but the city that takes in the fees.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This is great, should be implemented in all cities. Most people who can use public transport should.

[-] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago

Not all cities are equal. Many have large areas with no public transportation available.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's also very easily fixable

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] dx1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Fixing traffic by... discouraging people from driving, lol. Well I'm not complaining.

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Outstanding move on NYC's part.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] gilbert31@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Sam from Wendover did a very good job explaining why Congestion Pricing is the best solution to address this particular problem, including arguments on why this is not a regressive tax when you analyze it closely.

Canonical YouTube link so you can use your favorite Invidious/Piped instance https://youtu.be/B2j-LgcA7Gk

[-] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

inb4 the supreme court rules that congestion charging is unconstitutional and furthermore that public transport, too, is unconstitutional.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If the founding fathers didn’t explicitly mention it in the Constitution then clearly it’s unconstitutional.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Pooping is unconstitutional.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

But removing the separation between chruch and state is, any part of the constitution (ex: Article six, the first amendment, the fourteenth amendment, and multiple supereme court rulings on the constitution) are clearly just liberal lies

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Congestion pricing bad, private tolls good

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11095 readers
377 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS