95

It’s been nice to see ordinary Americans open up to life in China but everyone is acting blind to their censorship. Makes me thankful for the fediverse and being able to self host my own instance.

(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xep@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

Posting anything about any Chinese leader is verboten.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Loss@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Xiaohongshu bans all politics, even references. There's more serious platforms for those type of people, whereas xiaohongshu is to have fun and connect with others.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Awwww, you poor thing.

They didn't see you as a useful idiot so they leveraged their hatred for what you are and banished you.

Leopards are hungry on both sides of the line.

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Well yeah, Mao Zedong is kinda like Chinese Muhammad or Chinese Charlemagne (not supporting the guy, but still). Were you not expecting to catch some passionate attention? I mean, I'd also ask that of everyone; China is kind of known for censoring things, like Italians and cheese or Icelanders and their elves, so it's weird to see people think the equivalent of "I'm going to a flock of crows dressed up as an owl because it's exercising freeeeeeeedom!"

I don't "support" that from a Chinese government perspective, as their journey for power and reach, like a lot of territorial groups, involved lots of death and domination over things that couldn't "ethically" be owned, but from a service owner's perspective, I mean, if it's rightfully the child of your own two hands, it's just your right to ban as you wish.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

the real name of this app in chinese is "Little Red Book"

surprised?

[-] tellmeaboutit@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago

In English, Mao’s book is called the “little red book” but that’s not the case in China. The direct translation of what they call it in China is “red treasure book”. As such, the name of the app only seems like a Mao reference to people who translated xiaohongshu into English.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 5 points 1 week ago

I can read Chinese. Maoist thought and censoring of Mao should not be connected lol

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

good point. i think i misunderstood your initial title

[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

I still don't understand the title.

[-] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

One of the most cringe things I've ever read.

[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
95 points (84.2% liked)

Casual Conversation

1910 readers
188 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS