55
submitted 5 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/movies@lemm.ee

Also known as the Razzies, the trophies are handed out annually by the Golden Raspberry Foundation for what are deemed the worst films, filmmakers, and film performers of the year.

Ahead of the March 1 ceremony, look inside to see who is leading the charge of nominees for 2024’s films.

Worst Picture

  • Borderlands
  • Joker: Folie à Deux
  • Madame Web
  • Megalopolis
  • Reagan
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 months ago

Joker didn't suck, it just wasn't the movie people wanted.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I like musicals and still think it was pretty bad. It's a jukebox musical which are usually bad anyway.

Almost none of the songs move the story forward. Most of them are just we are in love numbers. You get one maybe two of those a musical.

Joaquin Phoenix is a good actor and a terrible singer. Lady Gaga is a good singer and terrible actor. So every scene with them both has one of them doing a bad job.

[-] jbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I decided to skip Joker 2 once I heard it was a musical (and then I heard the reviews were bad).

You got me curious about Phoenix's singing so I looked up some clips on YouTube.

You were right, it's not good. Not good at all.

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

I liked that the songs marked the "imagined" sequences. There was no singing in the things that really happened.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I agree it didn't suck, but in addition to not being the movie people wanted, it also wasn't good at the thing it was.

I'd be shocked if it won any razzies given the stiff competition, but that doesn't mean making it was a good idea.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 months ago

but the movie they needed

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That was kind of the point of that movie.

But I thought they did really good in it.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 23 points 5 months ago

Joker 2 might grab the headlines and could win because of its higher profile, but there are some strong contenders and, with a level playing field, Madame Web should sweep up. With Kraven the Hunter also in the running for some awards, Sony might want to take a while pondering their misguided attempt at a Spider-Man-less Spider-Man Universe.

[-] SineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Joker 2 winning anything would be a snub to how terrible Borderlands and Madame Web were. Punish the corporate slop, not the artsy risk that didn't pan out.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 months ago

i'm convinced that whole thing is a tax fraud. i don't know how specifically, but it's a scam/scheme

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 7 points 5 months ago

Uwe Boll has entered the chat.

[-] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

There is something about losing the movie rights to the characters if they don't use them within a certain time frame IIRC.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

oh a hundred percent that's a major factor. but aren't they already getting that from animated spider-man, a property everyone actually likes

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 21 points 5 months ago

Joaquin Phoenix for Worst Actor>. /doubt

Haven't seen the movie but he's always been more than adequate with his performances. My guess is it's either bad directing, editing, or both that he's taking the rap for.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 months ago

the movie is intentionally bad. if he's bad in it, it's just because he did the job he was asked, aka, he did a good job being an actor

[-] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

I didn’t think Joker 2 was a bad movie. It was well acted and beautifully filmed. It was just a poor sequel to the original and told a story that nobody cared about. I’d almost call it “artsy”.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

It has very slow segments but I'd agree it was well done mostly, until the end. That ending is the stupidest shit ever. Very disappointing.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Oh, good thing I missed that part, then.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

"most expensive art film I've paid to see" is what I said to my friends as we left the theater

[-] Ithorian@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

Borderlands should sweep. Legit one of the worst movies I've seen in my life.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago

Why I'd give it to Madame Web is Borderlands was heavily edited late on to remove any violence, leaving it a real mess and not what was intended. With Madame Web what you get on the screen is closer to what was intended (although the actors claim what they shot wasn't the script they signed up for).

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Of that list, I've only watched Madame Web. It was awful but I did get through it.

I started watching Borderlands and only got through 20 minutes before I shut it off.

I had no interest in any of the rest so I can't speak to their quality.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
55 points (93.7% liked)

[moved to piefed] movies

4272 readers
1 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS