56

I'll start by saying I had a bit of trouble wording the title but I'll try to elaborate on it. I find it can be a bit daunting at times figuring out what a decent entry point is in a series of video games without searching online first. Sometimes there will be ten games released across three different generation of consoles with reboots, prequels, and remasters and you can feel a bit left out of the loop if you start with the most recent release.

I'm wondering where people would recommend starting in other popular series like Nier, Final Fantasy, Armored Core, Ace Combat, Assassins Creed, Metal Gear, Metroid, Resident Evil, and so on.

It might make for a fun bit of Friday discussion and encourage some people to try out some new games.


Here's my example:

With the Fallout series I'd say you could easily start with any game because you have a new protagonist each time and a lot of the lore is reintroduced. The exception being Fallout 2 because it feels a bit more like a direct sequel to the original.

I would probably recommend Fallout New Vegas as a starting point because it's the fan favorite, has a few quality of life upgrades over Fallout 3, Fallout 4 adds a lot of extra mechanics to the game so going backwards in the series if you wanted more Fallout could feel a tad awkward and take some readjusting if you are accustomed to them, and the classic Fallout games can be a bit of a challenge if you aren't used to old school RPGs.

(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I started Wizardry 8 as my first one and it instantly became one of my favourites. Even though the story is somewhat continuation of 6 and 7, not knowing these is not a problem at all. It's still interesting and well explained even for novice players. Much later I've tried both 6 and 7 and even though I felt I could like them and I even liked the hand made graphics, it was the user interface of the early 90s that was just too much for me.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

commander keen. there really is no need to play 1-3, 4-6 is where it's at. just make sure you pirate the non-buggy version (there's a broken version of one or more of these games floating around abandonware sites where it looks like it works but the save game feature forgets to save your keys, which breaks some of the levels if you reload).

Any recommendations on where to start with Dragon Age?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 1 week ago

counter strike!

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Start with The Witcher 3 and head back to 2.

I was just thinking about witcher 1 while coming in this morning

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moody@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

For Metroid, start with 2, then Super is a big step up in terms of feel and gameplay. The first one doesn't explain anything at all, and compared to modern standards feels quite clunky and tedious (you have to find multiple secret passages to finish the game normally, for example.) It's worth playing if you're in the mood for NES-era retro gaming, but it can be frustrating trying to figure it out on your own.

For lore, Fusion is next, followed by Dread. I didn't like Fusion, felt too hand-holdy for me, I would skip it but many seem to like it. Dread is worth playing on its own though. It's a much faster pace, more action-oriented gameplay. Fusion added a horror element to the game, but for the most part it's more for vibe than gameplay reasons. Dread took that scary vibe and moved it into the gameplay.

The Prime series I think is a separate canon story. They can definitely be played independently. They follow a storyline and are direct sequels to each other, but gameplay-wise they don't require playing other games before. You don't unlock any important knowledge relevant to one game from playing the previous one.

[-] bonegakrejg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Substitute 1 with Zero Mission, which is a much better remake.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

All you'd get with starting with an earlier Arma than 3 is losing quality of life features and gaining eurojank

[-] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Oh come on! First Arma (Operation Flashpoint) had photorealistic graphics and played like a dream... That's how I remembered it until I tried it 20 years later. Boy oh boy...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

Gaming

20529 readers
490 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS