68

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/23276792

A project called "Remove-DEI" shows the tweaks used to remove "forbidden words" from a database about childhood school readiness.

The updates, shown in Github commits, are to a database for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Head Start program. They show a project called “Remove-DEI,” which reveal some of the back-and-forth that is happening behind the scenes to align federal agencies with Donald Trump’s executive orders that forbid almost anything having to do with race or gender within federal agencies. The Github pages show software engineers discussing amongst themselves how to best remove all instances of “forbidden words” from a specific database, and the code updates they used to do it. The changes also show that, while thousands of government datasets are disappearing from the internet, even ones that remain are having parts of their utility deprecated or broken in a way that may not be visible to those outside the government.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kbal@fedia.io 29 points 5 days ago

So many mission statements will be lost when they accidentally delete everything containing the word "transparent."

[-] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 5 days ago

The USGS has renamed "jadeite" to "jate".

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 21 points 5 days ago

Ministry of truth

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago

If it's still in git, then it's not actually purged. Nobody tell the fash.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 9 points 5 days ago

One of the Muskrat's kits will undoubtedly tell him sooner or later. Then Github'll get a takedown order.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Dropped branches get all their commit trees purged, unless the commits are also part of another branch.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 4 days ago

First they came for the "master" branch name, but I didn't care what the "reference" branch was called.

Then they came for "blacklist", and while it was a BS mixup with the "black book", I didn't really care what the "deny/allow list" was called.

Now they're coming for "Remove-DEI" and "forbidden words"... and they're pushing it as a bigoted administrative mandate using the same censoring procedures in overdrive.

[-] Kissaki@beehaw.org 7 points 5 days ago

I wonder how many software devs and admins now weigh their morals. And how many reject to implement or not.

[-] melp@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago

Can't imagine many. Many didn't have issues with 2016's Cambridge Analytics shenanigans and with how their apps ignored queer and brown people being habitually targeted over the years. I've met a few "liberal" software devs here in LA and they're at the same level of insufferable as gentrifying real estate agents. Sigh.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I dont understand.

The US government is using public git repos as a database? Huh?

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37982 readers
582 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS