Trump either bought, or didn't buy a Glock. Hmmm.
Maybe Dark Brandon needs to come out to play. If Trump can suggest murdering a Federal Employee, maybe Brandon can suggest taking out a former President.
I still vividly remember watching the Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Miley personally escorting Donald Trump through peaceful protesters being beaten and gassed to a Church Trump had never been to, to hold up a bible Trump had never read. Don't try selling me Mark fucking Miley, that fucking fascist enabler can go straight to hell.
Dumbest take of the day award goes to you.
Inform yourself and you might realize Milley was one of the only people keeping us from going completely off the rails. Trump fooled him once and not again.
never thought i'd see someone ignore a problem with trump because it involves someone that had worked for the government during the trump administration. if that was your best example, something he may not even had realized was fully going on at the time, than wow. sure, let trump get away with something because you hate trump. the damn logical inconsistency is astounding. you hate him so much (which is fine, i think he's terrible too and should be in jail) that you've wrapped around and are now accidentally and implicitly defending him. its like you had a buffer overflow error.
He does raise a good point though. Milley is less innocent bystander than just the latest Trump enabler that Trump has decided to sacrifice for no doubt failing some kind of perceived loyalty test. It's not logically inconsistent that they both suck, and it's probably worth reminding people that just because he's being attacked by Trump doesn't make him a good guy. All that said though, this is very blatantly stochastic terrorism on Trumps part.
Let's practice on Trump and the GOP. Don't wanna get anything wrong.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News