8
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gerryflap@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

Cool, but less cool when I remember what dark shit this kind of technology can be used for

[-] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

*will be used for

[-] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Really cool, but really scary, all I see is facial biometrics from 1 km away.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago

And suddenly masking got a whole lot more popular.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

superconducting nanowire single-photon detector

Don't suppose they sell those on aliexpress yet?

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

But Elon thinks camera vision is enough to drive a car.

[-] Yprum@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Well, not to side with the fascist shithead, but you know, "broken clock...". The thing is, camera vision is kinda enough... It's an entirely different thing if it could be better, improved, safer, or whatever by adding LiDAR or other tech...

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago

In fog, in a sand storm, in any heavy weather yer gonna want LiDAR.

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Their camera gets confused by large objects in the dark that obstruct it's view. It has crashed into a few overturned vehicles at night because it didn't know what they were and just disengaged instead of detecting an impasse and stopping.

[-] Yprum@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it makes it better and more reliable in harsh conditions, I agree, but driving has always been based on people looking where they go, so camera imagery is enough for driving. If it is not safe for a person, then it's not safe for a car with only cameras. Plus only having cameras doesn't mean you cannot use special equipment, IR cameras can improve visibility on harsh conditions too. Not that I mean they are used, but you know, it's a matter of what we mean with "enough to drive". Again, I want to emphasize that I agree, having LiDAR or other tech would be much much better.

[-] pipe01@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago

If humans can do it why not cameras?

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, you chose to be confidently incorrect about this?

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

77628 readers
812 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS