[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

Rent seeking and usury (the charging of interest)

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 19 points 1 day ago

It honestly seems worse.

It's pretty easy to get a ramp built, fixing stupid is much harder.

57
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

"Certified" == crippled?

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 28 points 5 days ago

hippopotamus

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 225 points 5 days ago

Yup, kernel level "anti-cheat" is a rootkit spyware that "pinky swears" it's only spying for a good reason.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 32 points 6 days ago

One of the biggest rules in IT is always have a backup.

A cashless society has no backup.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 12 points 6 days ago

That isn't what they're saying.

Renaming would be disruptive, while replacement names could one day be seen as offensive

They're saying if we rename the Hitler beetle the Bob Ross beetle, it could one day come out that Bob Ross committed genocide or something, so then they have to rename it again.

I'm not saying that's a good reason, but it's a slightly better one.

44
285
31
217
16

"accidentally"

809
32
34
5
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 139 points 2 months ago

The largest shareholder of the NYT is Carlos Slim, who happens to also own an oil company.

63
24
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 150 points 2 months ago

The hitperson is the only competent employee left at Boeing.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 163 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In general, if it passed peer review it shouldn't matter how it was written.

The fact the blatant examples apparently made it past peer review show how shoddy the process is though.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 190 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
view more: next ›

RobotToaster

joined 10 months ago