84
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

No coincidences, trump will always bring disease and ruin. You keep welcoming the fox back into the henhouse, America.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

Between this and Gaza (and everything else), I really honestly don't think we have seen a person in all of human history who checks more boxes of being the antichrist.

Like fuck, he literally brings pestilence and disease with him.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

If it escapes under Trump's leadership can we call it the trump virus? Please?

[-] Tramort@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Palerider@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bird flu boogaloo

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Morbus Maga.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

The constant edging with bird flu mania is going to make people not pay attention when it actually pops off.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is it popping off. We've already lost a huge portion of chickens in the US. We're seeing dozens of cases in humans. And it's in cows too. The only reason it doesn't feel like a big deal is because we as a nation aren't doing anything about it yet, only individual farms are. Same way COVID went from "is this a big deal?" to "oh fuck shut everything down".

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

The big event will be someone with regular human flu getting bird flu, giving the virus opportunities to swap DNA segments. If it gets the transmissibility of our standard influenza and the lethality of bird flu, it'll be a rough six months to a year before we have vaccines for it as it rips through our population.

Especially considering flu vaccines are made with eggs, and this disease is currently thoroughly decimating our egg producing livestock.

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The lethality is 52%. If it rips through the population, we're looking at total collapse well before the vaccine is available.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Highly dependent on the degree to which it's contagious. But you're right, especially considering we're looking at one of the worst flu seasons in more than a decade currently. If all flu cases were 50% lethal that'd be 10-15 million deaths.

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

The problem is that the CDC isn't getting to say anything right now, so we can assume that the moment they get to talk about it, the stupidest people you know are going to go "woah this was really sudden! They clearly made it in a lab!"

[-] teft@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's actually a really good counter point that I hadn't thought of.

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you, I've spent a lot of time giving myself brain damage so I can understand the perspective of conservatives.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Huff a lot of glue or paint, maybe ram a crayon or two in your brain. Then you might get close to understanding.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

If we just stop testing it will go away like magic. Did you learn nothing from Covid?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

When would you like to be alarmed? For me it was when it jumped to mammals.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The little boy who called bird flu, but I think the call here is that it is difficult to feel safe behind the idea that it does not cross the species barrier when you have bird flu in cows.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately people will just think "Hey I've seen this bird flu in the news and it didn't seem bad." Then they ignore all virologist recommendations and we have a second pandemic.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Too little information is as bad as too much, it is a difficult balance. The problem with information dissemination last time was not oversaturation but that people latched onto ridiculous conspiracy narratives and that derives from lack of basic education not too much news.

[-] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 week ago

And this time there will be zero investment in stopping it spreading when it starts killing people

[-] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

There is also a reputed new cat-to/from-human transmission vector for H5N1, which was briefly noted in a CDC report last week before being redacted: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/06/health/cdc-bird-flu-cats-people.html . NYT article may be paywalled, but details can be found in other media sources as well.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

If we could get enough people to stop eating animal products at the same time, it would simultaneously lower their personal risks of infection, the risks of another pandemic, and it could hit the animal ag industries hard - who are some of the largest funders of the gop.

[-] Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org 10 points 1 week ago

In the last pandemic, we couldn't get people to wear a mask sometimes without them losing their shit.

[-] Tofu_Ninja@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

I love the enthusiasm but the movement would immediately be labelled as woke and a lot of people would start eating more animals just to “own the libs”

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, we just need to lean into their toxic male fragility. Remind them it's super gay to have some animal's meat in their mouth. So juicy it slides right down your throat. Yeah, you enjoy that beef on your tongue, you slut?

If we really pushed that message, Joe Rogan would be vegan within a week.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

The people who would do that would be putting themselves at greater risk when the next pandemic does break out. That's their problem - especially if they've been informed on everything they can do to help and protect themselves.

[-] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

That’s their problem

Unfortunately, with how pandemics work, it would be everyone's problem.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

It already is, and they're already speedrunning us into the next one. All the more reason to focus on protecting who we can, and who is willing to not be an active harm.

[-] Xed@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I’ve been doing my part of drinking stuff with oat milk and eating a plant based diet

[-] artificialfish@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

The worst thing the left could do is go after people’s meat.

Set environmental targets and cruelty laws, but get out of here with associating the left with veganism.

[-] singletona@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Corona 2 electric boogaloo here we come!

[-] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This would be much worse than COVID. Bird flu is far more deadly.

[-] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago

in the beginning yes, but as the virus mutates, the variant that spreads quicker will also be less deadly. like with covid too. not that it isn't dangerous now, but it was far deadlier in the early stages.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

in a country that could start acting against this virus right now with RNA vaccine research has probably closed down all those facilities

[-] SolidShake@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The mask thing is going to be so funny again..... I guess .. ughhhhhhhhhhhh. Subscribe to the WHO if you haven't already

I'd be more than willing to build special warehouses for the unvaccinated manned by doctors and midwives with tons of knowledge about holistic medicine and essential oils, get them out of real hospitals

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

wouldn't doubt if this is musk and thiel, sowing chaos.

also wouldn't doubt if covid was them too.

just like how thiel dry runned a bank collapse with silcon valley bank. or musk dry runned doge with Twitter.

they dry runned h5n1 with cov19.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee -5 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe I'm late to the party, but do you think that the actual plan might be to kill as many of us as possible to weaken any potential uprising?

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I read somewhere that the previous Trump administration did make some policy decisions based on the belief that those on the left would be disproportionately impacted by covid. But do not underestimate how inept and incompetent Trump is also.

Make an effort to be healthy, and keep updated with flu vaccines. Moderna recently received funding for developing h5n1 vaccines, so keep an eye on that. And don't wait - you never know what stupid things Trump might do to suppress vaccine access.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/republicans-died-double-democrats-covid-b2227425.html

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Who's plan? The ketamine addicts or the pants shitter?

They aren't smart enough to develop a disease, but they are stupid enough to think that if they don't do anything about it, no one will notice (don't test for covid and the numbers will go down)

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think it's human nature to "look for a reason" but ... these engineered virus narratives have never set well with me. It implies that the only way a pandemic could happen is if some person created it; that's incredibly self indulgent, "the only way man could die to nature is if man invented nature."

Viruses just happen; we've had a reprieve from major plagues and things and have been unusually healthy because vaccines and other advances in medicine allowed us to save many that would have otherwise died.

The only parts humans are playing in our current health crises are: A) Increasing the number of unvaccinated people giving viruses once nearly killed off room to play again B) Increasing the temperature of the planet which has been demonstrated to increase mutation rates and may release lost viruses trapped in ice and permafrost C) Cutting down large swaths of the Amazon rainforests which may also harbor lost viruses

In all cases, we're not creating the problem directly, we're just giving the advantage back to nature that research from recent centuries gave to us.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah, the classic baseless dummy conspiracy theory of governments murdering own people for a reason or another.

Edit: typo it -> or

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh man, my comment wasn't totally serious but totally based on fear. I guess that's exactly how conspiracies start. If my rhetorical-turned-accidental-theory turns out to be right, I'm gonna be super-bummed.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, another trait is "it might be true". Dude, it might be true that anther head grows on you, but it's not very likely, is it?

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Quit talking probability around my second head. He's none-too-smart and doesn't handle fractions well.

[-] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

The Fartographer over here being whimsical and catching flack. I see you, map maker.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

*flak, and they're a fartographer, not a cartographer.

[-] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Technically correct. The best kind.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
84 points (98.8% liked)

science

16087 readers
61 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS