107
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Verbatim is doing more than just keeping the formats on life support – it also unveiled new hardware at CES 2025. Its Slimline Blu-ray Writer lets you back up 4K video to Ultra HD Blu-ray and even comes bundled with antiquated Nero disc burning software.

This is the important part imo, given that LG and Sony both pulled out of the USB Blu-ray reader-writer market

https://www.verbatim-europe.com/en/blu-ray-writers/products/external-slimline-blu-ray-writer-43890

Means we'll be able to rip Blu-ray's into the future. At least, that's what I hope. Need to check there are cracks for these writers.

EDIT: Won't link to it here, but many Verbatim writers, UHD and otherwise, use Pioneer hardware internally and are therefore crackable.

What's the benefit of cracking the drive?

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Probably that you can backup your own media

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a bd writer, it can backup my media out of the box.

Edit: oh, I see. You mean "backup". Lol gotcha. Yeah, cracking would be needed for that.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[-] philpo@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

M-Disc/Archive Blue ray discs are currently pretty much unrivaled if one needs WORM(write once read many) storage for important data.

Anything cloud is an issue in that regards, while a few options exist that somewhat imitate WORM to comply with regulations they are often expensive, harder to maintain and, if long term storage is required, prohibitivly expensive.

The next option, Tandberg RDX needs a far less popular writer, it's WORM media is far more expensive, far more sensitive towards exterior influences and it's much harder to make sure you will be able to read the data in 20 years.

LTO is nice, the tapes are somewhat cheap but the drives are extremely expensive - far to expensive for smaller businesses or consumers.

(And please for the love of god, normal exterior HDs,etc. are NOT backup media for long term storage, especially not WORM- which is important in times of ransomware attacks)

So in the end verbatim would be an absolute idiot to destroy this market. I work with a lot of smaller healthcare facilities and they all exclusively work with them - they routinely burn their data on a M-Disc that is then stored in a secure location, as they all need to provide their patient records for at least 10, mostly for 15, in some cases for 30 or more years. The doctors can literally go to jail if they do not comply with that.(And getting hacked or your building burning down is not an excuse)

As a CEO of a small company we also need to retain certain tax and accounting data for 10 years, some for 20 years. And even as a individual I have some stuff I legally must retain for 10 years.

And of course photos of important life events and some documents (insurance, mortgage) are also something I don't want to loose if the house burns down. Therefore the important stuff gets burned to a M-Disc three times a year and then locked into a bank vault quite a bit away.

[-] slinkyjelly@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

What do people normally store one write one mediums I feel like I'd have a hard time working with write once items except for like maybe just music storage

[-] philpo@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Personally I store all "Very important data" on it - things I really don't want to loose even if my data storage at home and my cloud storage gets compromised. Among them:

  • Photos of life events. Wedding, photos of the kids, photos of relatives that are now deceased, etc.

  • Important documents. Birth certificates, copies of IDs, passports, insurance documents, degrees and certificates, banking/taxation/accounting documents, bills for the important stuff like major renovations, the expensive IT stuff, etc.*

  • Backup of important files (for me Uni files for my lectures, some work files, backup of the password DBs, plans for the house, a tutorial how to receive files from the cloud storage, decryption keys, etc.)

(*: This is more a theoretical choice - as I can get 100GB media for the same price as the 50GB I currently simply copy the full paperless file storage. But the script normally only copies these. They are flagged with a custom field in paperless)

I do not use addition to the storage,so no "these files are new since the last copy" but I simply make a full backup of these files every time (usually three times a year). This reduces the risk of one backup being compromised - very likely I only fall back 4 month which is tolerable. The discs itself are stored in a locked box in a bank vault a bit further away. I have to go there a few times a year anyway,so it's not hassle. (And they have great coffee). The box costs me 50€ a year and has enough room for 50 years of M Disks and a few extra items.

Anything taxation related must be stored for 10 years even by private individuals here,so there is that.

My customers (smaller health care organisations, e.g. your fellow neighbourhood dentist or GP) usually store patient data and accounting data on them. They need to store them long term (up to 30 years) for legal reasons, additionally they don't want a opposing lawyer to later tell them "you have manipulated the data". Having multiple copies that cannot be manipulated reduces that claim to "you manipulated before you stored it" and we have other ways to fight that.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Could you store a checksum of the backup with an NFT? Think I just threw up a little bit there, but perhaps there is actually a use case for them them. At least it proves the backup remains since it was created regardless of how many copies you have

[-] Integrate777@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago

This is perhaps more useful, serving as both checksum and data correction.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive

Not that it can fit in the blockchain though. At least from what little I know about blockchains, they can't possibly store any substantial amount of data.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

In theory maybe? But...I don't know why one should.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

How are external HDs not a backup? Sure if it's left attached 24/7 it would also get caught by ransomware potentially but otherwise surely that is what external media is good for?

Most of my data isn't that important, but have a script that can sync a live copy to several locations over the LAN and create a timestamped compressed folder of it, usually keep a few of the timestamped copies on external media.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

External HDs are good for short term backup - I do use them for that myself.

But they are not suitable for long term backup, they are susceptible to damage, sector errors,bit rod and interference.

If you leave them unpowered for longer times the chances that the mechanical components are gonna fail are actually increased.

Some of these issues can be reduced,but never fully.

Additionally there are ransomware viruses that directly attack them - they intentionally encrypt the backups first when the drives are connected before they attack the live data. And in at least one case I know of the attackers bricked the HD firmware.

Therefore for long term storage of really important things WORM (write once read many) media is to be preferred - even if the attackers can access the disk for some reason they cannot alter the once written data.

[-] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

I still burn discs every now and then. Definitely glad to see I don't have to panic buy stockpiles of them now.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Work to preserve physical media across all your entertainment. You give away your leverage as a consumer with every stream and digital "purchase" (because of course you legally own nothing digital from these companies, you lease the right to access them, until that company decides you no longer get that access, see Sony)

[-] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I've had good luck with their stuff so I'm pleased

[-] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unfortunately I don't think Verbatim manufactures any quad-layer discs, so Sony was the only real option for 128GB disks.

Furthermore, M-Disc is still very pricey per-GB, and their non M-Disc BD disks aren't priced that much better. I've also recently got a spindle of Verbatim BDXLs that every single one would fail to either write or read at the layer transitions, so having a single option here is already proving to be painful.

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

Disc failure is the verbatim I remember, but I'm glad they're still around. My 2008 car has a 6 disc CD changer, and I have a few retro PCs which rely on CDs too. Yes, I know I can get adapters for CF cards and the like, but doing things the old way is the whole point.

[-] Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

This is good news. I burn my some of my medias to DVD and Blu-ray discs.

[-] Fleur_@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 week ago

Hi, I have some questions about this. I'm interested in storing movies and tv shows on Blu ray discs. If I burn video formats onto discs how hard is it to get those to play back on various different Blu ray players. I imagine it's simple when it's connected to a PC but what about through typical Blu ray players you might plug into your tv or a gaming console like a PS4?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

As long as they are the right region format for the DVD player they should be fine. Ripped files don't really have region formats anymore, but you can add the appropriate one in most burners.

You can also get region agnostic players but that's probably harder to do now than just making all your media in the right format.

[-] Fleur_@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 week ago
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Okay so I've just tested it. I took a DVD that was in PAL format and ripped it, when I burn it to another disc It now doesn't have any region protection at all so I guess the readers just totally remove it, so you probably don't even need to add a region.

I only have a PS5 to test it on and it worked okay on the PS5 I don't know about random crappy DVD players you got from the supermarket they might not work.

Also that was a DVD not a Blu-ray because I have literally no idea how you would even burn blu-rays, is it even a thing, regardless I don't think I can do it.

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Verbatim for the win

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I have a stack of Verbatim blanks I bought years ago just in case they ever stopped being sold; I’ve actually used quite a few to create daisy disks and audio CDs.

[-] dan69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I did get a ~128 micro sdxc (micro center branded) for free, so, im kinda on the fence, but wont mind rocking a cd player again!

[-] Exec@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago

~128 micro sdxc (micro center branded) for free

How bad is it, Class 4 perhaps?

[-] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

SDs are cheap these days, 128 class 10 for 9$. Just don't buy them for OS level writes, logging is ok.

[-] dan69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

My goal was to just use it as media storage, smol formats and minimal use cases

[-] dan69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Kinda afraid to even look it up or try it. 🙈

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Can someone tell me, why weren't optical discs (mechanically, ergonomically) designed similarly to floppies? In a protective envelope with a window.

Sony PSP discs had something like that. More expensive and impractical from looks, the window part was always open and cleaning it from dirt is inconvenient if untouched for long. But then the cover for that window wouldn't break off, and the looks solve the problem of "looking obsolete" that arises with clueless baboon crowds. Sony engineering back then somehow evokes feelings in me.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Og CDs came in a protective case like that, as did some large optical discs. But I guess it was just cumbersome and needlessly expensive to make the hardware?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago
[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Turned out that scratches can easily be avoided if you are careful, and - more importantly - a few scratches won't prevent the disc being read, thanks to the error correction.

Back in the day I remember using one of those AOL internet sign-up junk discs as a drinks coaster, for several years. As you'd expect from grinding around on my desk it was filthy and scratched to total hell, never mind the thermal stress of hundreds of hot tea mugs being sat on it. I'd never seen a CD looking so bad.

One day out of curiosity I decided to wipe it off and put it in the PC to see what would happen. I was genuinely surprised when the AOL splash popped up (and also a little disgusted because I had no love for AOL and was hoping I'd killed it)

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Price. Once the industry retooled the production lines, CDs became dirt cheap to reproduce, and successive generations of optical media are only somewhat more expensive. Plastic shells and mechanisms cost money. CDs are probably the cheapest physical audio format ever (at least as far as production costs are concerned).

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

63023 readers
2381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS