100
submitted 6 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 months ago

For the past 10 years or so, most climate change activity was, in a large part, a massive subsidy for oligarchs.

For those actually interested in stopping emissions, we know that carbon pricing is efficient and actually raises tax revenue instead of taking government money.

It could have even been introduced slowly enough to allow private capital to efficiently transition without subsidies. And by transferring the proceeds to the public as tax rebates, the public would not be poorer and most would even be richer.

Instead, we got massive tax subsidies for oligarchs. Sure, some of those subsidies were relatively efficient. But in the end, they still saddled the public with debt in order to enrich the few.

So no, I am not surprised that they were faking it all along. It was obvious from the start.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 6 months ago

We never had the support in congress to pass carbon pricing, which is why the Inflation Reduction Act was structured the way it was.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Correct, because Congress is corrupt and is eager to saddle the next generation of Americans with an absolute humongous debt load of $36 trillion in order to pay off their corporate sponsors and lobby groups.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Hypocritical shitheads

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Wolves in sheep's clothing.

No more billionaires, no more problems with billionaires.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
100 points (98.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7169 readers
451 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS