18
submitted 4 weeks ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.ml
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago

They're eating the ~~dogs~~ beavers

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago

I really, really want to know why someone added that provision in the first place, and why it didn't immediately get removed as being utterly irrelevant.

Personally, I'm of the opinion that--aside from predators and pets--you should be eating animals that you intentionally kill. It seems wasteful and disrespectful to kill a nuisance animal, and then just leave the body to rot.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

They're just thinking ahead for Lent.

[-] omega_x3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Get to eating and stuffing those beavers

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

Better get some training in. His wife's not taking any bush league layabout BS. Get to work, and eagerly. 🤌🏼

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Dude Lawrence v Texas is still the law, you can eat beaver all you want for now

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
18 points (90.9% liked)

Not the Onion

2434 readers
12 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS