11
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Literally Lügenpresse. People need to get familiar with Hitler's playbook, cause that's the reality we're experiencing right now.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The same administration that was claiming that Europe is stifling the free speech. What hypocritics

[-] Superheavy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

There's a video where the press secretary basically says they will ban everybody that is telling 'lies'. I didn't know that asking questions as the press could now be considered lies but here we are. What a timeline we ended up in.

[-] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If you don't propagate their lies, then they'll call you a liar.

"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth." - 1984

[-] Enoril@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the other serious media have integrity, they should also remove themselves from any official event in the name of free speech (and future protection as that could happen to them later).

This is the only way to treat this kind of dangerous behavior.

[-] Superheavy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[-] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They relatively recent consider themselves not as news, but entertainment

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Only relatively.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

Sadly, it is not just Fox News that has made the claim that their shows are not news. In the same year, Rachel Maddow's lawyers successfully argued that her program is also not news.

https://www.kpbs.org/news/2020/may/23/san-diego-judge-dismisses-oans-10-million-defamati/

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is a bit of the classic "both sides being the same" argument. The first article you linked even calls it out.

In the Fox case, Carlson was presenting his own narrative, not even one extrapolating from known facts.

Maddow was like "hey this journalist is working for Putin and writing for OAN. OAN is Russian propaganda." When in reality, the journalist in question wrote for Sputnik News, which is affiliated with the Russian government. Granted it is a bit of a stretch to say all of OAN is Russian propaganda.

Carlson, on the other hand, just completely made up a story about Karen McDougal blackmailing Trump. A completely made up story.

So yeah, I wouldn't go saying both sides are the same here.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41155 readers
759 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS