75
And the dipshits in the House will completely ignore this
Yes, but when the House can't get their act together and service folk in the military have to work without pay (and all the others deemed essential), then senate can remind those essential people it was their representatives in the House that axed the workers paychecks (but not their own paychecks). Perhaps the freedom caucus will be free of their $174K+ a year jobs.
You would think. Turns out burning the government to the ground and forcing service members to work without pay is a winning stance in GA and FL these days
Yeah, but that's before you're told that you are essential and have to buy gas and come to work to pat down people before they board the airplane while not getting a check.
According to reuters https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-government-shutdown-what-closes-what-stays-open-2023-09-21/
2 million U.S. military personnel would remain at their posts. Agents at the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal law enforcement agencies would remain on the job, and prison staffers would continue to work. Border Patrol and immigration enforcement agents would continue to work, as would customs officers. Airport security screeners and air-traffic control workers would be required to work. U.S. embassies and consulates would remain open under the State Department's 2022 shutdown plan.
Those people might decide to vote for a non-republican candidate.
What's gonna rub the die hards the worst?
White House furloughs could make it harder to comply with the impeachment investigation of President Joe Biden, a Democrat, by Republicans in the House of Representatives.
The U.S. Constitution specifies that the president continues to get paid.
That's right, the Republican freedom caucus will potentially delay the impeachment investigation of President Joe Biden while he gets paid to be in office. And that might actually be a Democratic talking point, especially if there's the daily jab by Biden, "I just want to thank the Freedom Caucus for slowing down my impeachment investigation by shutting down the government. Thanks Marge!"
Right. Because that worked before.
It is also likely that House Republicans will strip out the minimal money for Ukraine that the Senate has included in its stopgap, senior GOP sources said, given that many hardliners are opposed to it and they can’t afford many defections.
Traitors to democracy in the pocket of Russia.
Conservative house extremists WANT a shutdown. They are anti-government more than they even care about any issues they bring up in particular. Since the result of a shutdown is exactly what they want, they have no incentive at all to avoid it.
If they had any quality of character these grifters would be refusing to take the pay and benefits package but is that what we see?
Noooooooooooooope.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
With just days to go before the government runs out of money, the Senate has unveiled a bipartisan stopgap bill in a bid to avert a shutdown – but there’s no guarantee that it will be able to pass in the House as a bloc of conservatives rail against the prospect of a short-term funding extension.
Schumer said earlier Tuesday, “We will continue to fund the government at present levels while maintaining our commitment to Ukraine’s security and humanitarian needs, while also ensuring those impacted by natural disasters across the country begin to get the resources they need.”
But House Speaker Kevin McCarthy told reporters that funding for Ukraine should not be included in a short-term spending package, and instead should be a standalone bill.
McCarthy has remained noncommittal on whether he would put a bipartisan Senate-passed stopgap measure to avert a shutdown on the floor this week ahead of the deadline.
McCarthy indicated that if the House is able to pass the series of spending bills it has lined up for consideration this week, then he would put a stopgap measure on the floor that includes border provisions.
Government operations and services that continue during a shutdown are activities deemed necessary to protect public safety and national security or considered critical for other reasons.
The original article contains 888 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
75 points (94.1% liked)
politics
19097 readers
2945 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS