142
submitted 3 days ago by jsomae@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain't dead. Remember, don't downvote for disagreements.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago
  • permanent revolution;
  • that parties should be democratic institutions;
  • that burocratization leads to deformed proletarian states.
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't like racism against white people or sexism against men. Do I think they're less urgent or worrying than bigotry directed at other groups? Sure. There's less hate against men and whites compared to other groups, and bigotry against them doesn't have the same social or political impact due to current systemic racism and sexism being directed at others. But bigotry is still bigotry, and I don't like bigotry against anyone.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

As a white man, it means nothing to me when someone uses my race against me. The historical context of oppression doesn’t accompany the insult. However, there have been times in my life when minorities have excluded me or shunned me for my race, which sucks, but it doesn’t mean I’m going to internet war over it.

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

As a woman I'm not a fan of calling men simple or easy. They've just been conditioned differently, and that's a continued part of the patriarchy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

That progressive people should prioritize economic equality ahead of social issues.

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I'd argue nearly every single social issue is an economic one. Abortion? Anti-abortion laws are intended to force people to have kids they can't afford, making them desperate for work to keep their kids fed and clothed. Racial equality? I mean, do I need to say more than the fact that most minorities are statistically poorer? The only one that can be argued is purely social is Trans people, and I simply can't fathom letting people die for being who they are, or ignoring the blatant attacks on them from the right.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago

They go hand-in-hand, though, and moreover "true economic equality" isn't possible when humans vary wildly in needs and abilities, hence Marx's whole attack on the so-called "equalitarians."

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Mental health focused communities exascerbate their members' issues

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 115 points 3 days ago

There can be too much political correctness at times.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 22 points 2 days ago

It's less 'too much pc' and more 'purity politics' imo

There's a great post on tumblr that really fuckin' nailed it:

"The trannies should be able to piss in whatever toilet they want and change their bodies however they want. Why is it my business if some chick has a dick or a guy has a pie? I'm not a trannie or a fag so I don't care, just give 'em the medicine they need."

"This is an LGBT safe space. Of COURSE I fully support individuals who identify as transgender and their right to self-determination! I just think that transitioning is a very serious choice and should be heavily regulated. And there could be a lot of harm in exposing cis children to such topics, so we should be really careful about when it is appropriate to mention trans issues or have too much trans visibility."

One of the above statements is Problematic and the other is slightly annoying. If we disagree on which is which then working together for a better future is going to get really fucking difficult.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

I don't like extreme leftists (they live in a bubble) but they've been right about everything and they are our best chance at resolving economic disparity

[-] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 2 days ago

Doesn't sound like they live in a bubble, then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 23 points 2 days ago

Immigration is universally a roaring net positive in all of history ; economically, socially, everything. It's more than disinformation when they spew talking points. It's hate. And most people complicit are just fully ignorant. USA lost their empire due to lack of education. Every other first world nations have their success in lockstep with the level of education they give their kids. A heist of all wealth has been conducted and you are viewing the aftermath. Elon will find your coffers empty. The real treasure, turns out, was the people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 77 points 3 days ago

I think we need to figure out how to make leftism more appealing to centrists, and particularly to the cis/straight/white/male demographic.

[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

IMO the biggest problem is media. They report through a center-right lens and focus on sensationalism. So all people see of the left is the "check your privilege cis white boy" and "anarchists have burned down the entire city" BS lines instead of the vast aid efforts and daily work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (55 replies)
[-] socsa@piefed.social 58 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Abortion is not a moral hazard at all. Most people who might exist don't. The whole "everyone agrees abortion is awful..." shit is obnoxious. I legitimately do not care. I am far more concerned about the lives of actual children. Once we seriously tackle that issue, we can move upstream, and this should be viewed as both incentive and a purity test for those who pretend to care about the "unborn."

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

If i was aborted I wouldn't care, because I would be aborted.

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As someone who was in a supportive relationship with a transgender person for 3 years and who personally struggles associating with my own gender (masculinity was never my thing lol), I never really got into the stating my gender pronouns.

I get why it's done for the times it matters and can do so in a sensitive space, but I get the sense it's usually done as public compliance (like a cis neolib as an email sig), which can lead to shallow support or worse, resentment. What we ultimately need is more genuine contact with people different from ourselves because that helps reduce "othering" a group.

Oh, but I do tend to default to "they" out of old internet habits. Always disliked the assumption all gamers are men.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] SuluBeddu@feddit.it 31 points 3 days ago

That intellectual property, both copyright or patents, doesn't serve its theoretical purpose and just acts as a legal shield for the monopolies of big corporations, at least in our capitalistic system, and it limits the spread of information

In theory, a musician should be protected against abuse of their music. In practice, all musicians need to be on Spotify through one of the few main publishers to make any decent money, and their music will be used for unintended purposes (intended for their contract at least) like AI training

In theory, patents should allow a small company with an idea to sell its progressive product to many big corporations. In practice, one big corporation will either buy the small company or copy the product and have the money to legally support its case against all evidence, lobbying to change laws too. Not to mention that big corporations are the ones that can do enough research to have relevant patents, it's much harder for universities and SMEs, not to mention big corporations can lobby to reduce public funding to R&D programs in universities and for SMEs.

And, last but not least important, access to content, think of politically relevant movies or book, depends on your income. If you are from a poorer country, chances are you cannot enjoy as much information and content as one born in a richer country.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
142 points (93.8% liked)

Asklemmy

45342 readers
1804 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS