61
“Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) was the lone GOP ‘no’ vote.”
Thought she wasn't a member of the "burn it all down party" anymore?
Not a member in name, but still "burn it all down" in spirit.
She's taken Rohrabacher's spot on Putin's payroll. Right, Kevin?
Honestly, she's so dumb she might be doing it for free.
I was just thinking earlier that there are two groups in congress that are advancing Russia's agenda. The ones actively working and following Russia's plan and the fucking idiots who have no idea what they are doing. I also think Greene falls in the fucking idiot category.
Greene spoke out against the aid for Ukraine following the vote. “I just voted NO to advance Ukraine funding bills. After tonight, we will find out who is actually against sending YOUR money to Ukraine. No more stump speeches. No more red meat. No more chest thumping in letters,” Greene wrote in a post on X.
What a piece of shit she is. You republiQans in Georgia really shat the bed good with this one. “Grow a brain, morans.”
They want to shut down the government so they can attack it again.
Thats what the con-artist Republicans want.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
House Republicans on Tuesday advanced four full-year spending bills, handing Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) a small win but doing little to stave off a government shutdown at the end of the month.
Her opposition did not come as a surprise: ahead of the vote, she said she was a “hard no” on the rule because two of the spending bills include funding for Ukraine.
The successful procedural vote marks an incremental win for McCarthy, who has struggled to advance spending measures this month amid conservative opposition.
The House tried to advance the Department of Defense appropriations bill twice last week, with hardline opposition sinking the measure both times.
Leaders in both parties and chambers have recognized that a continuing resolution will be needed to keep the lights on in Washington beyond the Saturday deadline, but the path to clearing such a measure is unclear.
House GOP leaders are hopeful that moving the four appropriations bills will make some of those Republican holdouts more open to a continuing resolution.
The original article contains 480 words, the summary contains 168 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Needs some work. In the second paragraph, who's opposition?
"Her opposition" = "The fact that she opposed the bill"
The summary doesn't indicate who "she" is. The previous name to be dropped was Kevin McCarthy.
Yeah, I got that from reading the article, the summary doesn't include that information. The summary also doesn't indicate who the 'her'is referring to. I think the summary needs some work to get all of the pertinent information.
Ah, I got you. Sorry, I misunderstood the original comment.
No problem. Have a great day!
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
61 points (93.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
3082 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS