418
submitted 1 year ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His silence on the shitshow happening downstairs speaks volumes. The only time he shuts up is when it's time to speak out against fascism

[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 year ago

Canada doesn't need a small pp

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

No smöl pp needed here!

[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago

We need a strong leader that can pull together other people to help navigate the American fascists, not a career politician who’s only claim to fame is being a career politician and trying to sell out Canada.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

who’s

whose?

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

Radical idea: maybe don’t vote for the guy most likely to sell Canada out to turd?

[-] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Too extreme. Wins all of Alberta, Saskatchewan and rural BC/MB/ON.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

There is one riding in Saskatchewan that flips back and forth from blue to orange. I doubt it will be orange this next election but a girl can hope.

[-] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

We can hope

[-] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

He began his leadership by supporting the truckers. That says it all right there.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What?!? For the 4th year running? Who was it before? O'toole?

[-] rabber@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Man that guy was so normal compared to this Pierre subhuman

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

ha ha ha I totally forgot O'toole even existed. And in my head, in place of his face, I can only picture the road salesman from The Office (US).

[-] Aconite@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Beating “none of them” by a healthy margin is quite the feat.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

31% of Canadians agree that Poilievre would be most likely to “roll over and accept whatever President Trump demands,” followed by Justin Trudeau (22%) and Jagmeet Singh (9%). Just 6% of Canadians say they same about Liberal frontrunner Mark Carney.

This is a major reason I bet that Carney will wipe the floor with him in a general election.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Trudeau hasn't rolled over any of Trump's shit so far...

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but Trudeau is Trudeau so... 🥹

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

One can hope

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Don't forget Freeland at 4%.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but she polls more than 15% behind Carney among the general public in the leadership race. It's why I didn't mention her.

E: As for federal election polling, here's the last Mainstreet numbers from two weeks ago:

Will post again when new numbers drop.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

On what? Last I checked her favourability was close to neutral, and the boost from nominating Carney vs. her was more like 5%.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The leadership race, numbers in Wikipedia from Leger and Mainstreet. Check my edit for general election numbers.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Am I blind, or does that show 5%? From 34% to 39%.

15% would change my perception of the whole race significantly.

Edit: Maybe you mean the numbers from the question (when asked by Mainstreet) "If you could vote in the Liberal leadership race who would you vote for?", which are in the table at the bottom of the wiki. The gap there is actually in the 20's as of a couple weeks ago, which is interesting.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the large gap was about the leadership election.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The point is to eventually unite all of north and south America as one country, change it's name to Oceania, and abolish all political parties in favor of one oligarch party called INGSOC

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Remember what Iceland did when their politicians sold their country to corrupt business men

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

That will NEVER happen in Canada. There is too much of the american delusion in Canadians that they are all temporarily poor millionaires.

If we start throwing rich people in jail maybe I'll be next!

And yet no one seems to care that being poor is punishable by law even though most of us are a few paychecks away from being homeless.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Crininals. Throw criminals in jail.

Iceland didn't throw them in jail because they were rich. They threw them in jail because they were criminals.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

They arrested the Prime Minister, the activists took control of the government, they declared the debt acrrued by the criminal government to be illegitimate, and they convicted the bankers of fraud.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
418 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

11877 readers
637 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS