439
submitted 3 months ago by imvii@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chris@lemm.ee 87 points 3 months ago

So, when Social Security gets gutted, we’re all getting the money we put in back, right? …right?!

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 64 points 3 months ago

Yes, of course! As long as you make at least $100M a year, all investments will be returned as tax breaks.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 19 points 3 months ago

Billionaires: anything less than one hundred million is basically the same as zero to me.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Eh, that's a tenth of their worth. It would be significant. But a million?

He's a fun fact. A billionaire expends the same percentage of wealth with 500,000; as a normal worker does buying a 20 dollar meal at Burger King.

[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago

I want it back + interest.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago
[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Every American should file for a refund of all the SS taxes they paid when they do their income taxes next year. With the gutting of the IRS on top of SS, they’ll probably accept those claims without question and accept those refunds.

[-] TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org 60 points 3 months ago

Musk has been spouting how Social Security is a scam and how tariffs will make up for it. Basically, kiss your social security pension away and just hope a substitute pops up - although it will likely be in the form of "get a check if you don't criticize us" now. DOGE is an excuse to Big Data everything from every department and process it through AI, including knowing your political association.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago

Hilarious.

“Social security is a scam” = “I’m taking your retirement money for myself”

“Tariffs will make up for it” = “As a bonus fuck you, 20% tax on everything you need to survive”

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

and just hope a substitute pops up

I have equal confidence in a trump designed Social Security replacement as the healthcare replacement trump came up with to replace Obamacare (ACA).

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

The American Prospect, which first reported earlier this week that Acting SSA Commissioner Leland Dudek was weighing staff cuts of up to 50%

Congratulations protest non voters, this is what you voted for.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

100% agree, and they need to never be allowed to forget this.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

alot of MAGA are stupid enough to believe hes just joking on what hes going to do, besides the bigotry.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

My nice but moronic neighbor is one of those "but he just talks a lot of shit, he won't do that" types. Surprise: he does talk a lot of shit and he's increasingly doing that shit too.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

he did it his first term, but he quickly covered it up how it was undone. this time he has nothing to lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (51 replies)
[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago

I work with two people that are within a year of retiring and they are absolutely ecstatic that Trump was doing this to Social Security, as well I work with people that are in their early 20s that are exactly the same happy that this is happening and thinking that they will all become super wealthy.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 months ago

My redneck trailer cock American family has absolutely nothing saved for retirement, but they think that social security tax took all of their money and gave it to people who are cheating the system pretending to be disabled

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

I hear the same bs too. I work with a few hardcore Mormons who say the same thing, its bizarre.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

did you ask them if they were making 400k+ year? because thats the only group above 400k that will benefit from all these tax cuts.

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

No I didn’t bring that up, I actually barely talk to anybody I work with anymore. I just listen and laugh to myself.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

this is the way

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago

Employer and employee both have to pay 6.2%, wanna bet they eliminate the employers portion?

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

Wanna bet my salary doesn't go up 6.2% when they do that?

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

An excuse for them to lower it by 7%

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

like alot of sketchy companies, employers will just eliminate some of thier employees even more to give them selves more money, and just squeeze out the skeleton crew for alot tech, biotech, and health

[-] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 months ago

A 99.7% accuracy rate gutted for profit? Efficiency isn't the goal; it's exploitation.

🐱

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

Buy the ticket, take the ride

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 7 points 3 months ago

Aaah first I really thought, well, there it is, they began the killing. I'm glad that's not what happened

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It's weird to me how much some people have internalized the politics of austerity this quickly.

The economy was humming under Biden. There was no emergency, no indicator that we have to "tighten our belts".

Then Bronzo enters the office and fElon with his MOE (Ministry of Efficiency) and all they want to do is cut everything. Even in the MOE Cinematic Universe....how do they possibly justify any of this shit? They plan on cutting taxes at the same time, so it's not about balancing anything.

What's worse, is that I now seeing lots of people on the left saying that government is bloated and should be cut, but done with precision. WTAF?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
439 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24192 readers
2873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS