237
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

It sucks that your country doesn't have a rule of law ngl.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 67 points 1 day ago

No way those bloodthirsty backstabbers vote for this.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago

That's the point. Opposition bills in the US are often put forth to force members of the majority party to publicly vote against it, so that there is public record of their position on things.

It's an easy system to game, too, since it's trivially easy to include a poisoned pill in the bill that will push the members to reject it.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

It's like how up here in BC we got 3 conservative MPs to vote against opposing tariffs. Sometimes you just float a clear "no-brainer" bill to make the assholes clearly proclaim their assholeitude.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It's important to never let the monsters hide behind their masks. They want passive compliance; never give it to them.

[-] TheGoddessAnoia@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago

Last I looked, any vote in Congress was foreordained unless a few Republicans were suddenly to come down with the measles, and even then, they'd probably drag themselves through DC, infecting everyone they passed, to prove their loyalty to their God Emperor.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

It's not about winning, it's about making them clearly state their intentions.

[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

It's bread and circus friend. Forcing congressmen to go public with their stance on the issue.

[-] TheGoddessAnoia@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

While I would agree with you and Voroxpete under the old rules of US politics, they no longer apply. Seems to me the average Representative either lies through his/her teeth (assuming they have any), or votes performatively, and then does something completely different, or nothing at all. I have come to really, really dislike this kind of performative vote, seeing my fellow Canadians mislead into believing it actually means that there are folks in the House, outside of two or three, who would actually do diddly-squat to prevent their country from overrunning its neighbours to achieve hegemony. Please don't tell me how your system works, because it stopped working somewhere around Mission Accomplished.

[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago

Well it's Dems that brought it, so it's a way for them to raise awareness at least.

It was referred to committee, so ya, a nothingburger

christ why not just spend that energy on the 25th and be done with this hellscape

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

25th has to be voluntary or enacted by a majority of the cabinet.

[-] Lemmist@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago

Trump: Pfft, I'll fund the army with healthcare money...

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

and take that money from its rightful owners (the rich)?

nah, it's deficit spending all the way down (including for a lot of those tax breaks the rich are getting)

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wars are fought and paid by the poor for the rich.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 19 points 1 day ago

Congress worried about special military operations?

Does the constitution say that only congress can declare war?

[-] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Only congress can declare "war", but as far as I know, that hasn't happened since WW2. The president just does what they want.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 1 day ago

well maybe like congress could get a back bone?

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Why doesn't Congress, the larger institution, simply eat the president?

[-] Tm12@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

This is how you end up with a brain worm.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 day ago

I guess they like what the president is doing?

Same with the courts?

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Backbone? The majority are Trunp sycophants, cravenly fawning over Trump, suggesting bills to put his orange face on Mount Rushmore and the $100 dollar bill. Voting down this bill will show that they have military intention on one, some, or all of those countries and will show them for who they really are.

[-] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

It’s a nice gesture but I don’t even think all democrats would vote for this.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago

Then they need to be voted out. No one voted to start wars with our own allies, especially not a fucking Democrat.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

I think point is to put on record for the history books who the turncoats are that supported this fascist takeover.

[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Then we know who gets helicopter rides when the rides turn. Never forget!

[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 0 points 13 hours ago

Haha yes, let’s execute politicians who vote for things we disagree with.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
237 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8639 readers
1896 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS