1263
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 350 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 78 points 3 weeks ago

Cries in only Chrome and Edge at work 😢

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 69 points 3 weeks ago
[-] takeda@lemm.ee 58 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. What company wouldn't allow it?

When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

[-] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 49 points 3 weeks ago

I would argue it's a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that's what I would mention.

[-] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

A good IT is blocking ads at a company-level. Browser extensions wouldn’t matter, and in fact, shouldn’t be allowed for the same reason.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

You can only catch so much at the edge and DNS level. Browser extension catches the stragglers that get through. But we've mitigated virtually all browser induced malware possibilities by just moving to cloud-based internet isolation. It's similar to what the DoD uses, if anyone's familiar with their use case: https://www.bylight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CBII_2020-2025.pdf

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 30 points 3 weeks ago

Officially only Edge is supported, but Chrome is tolerated. It's a full MS environment.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Same here. The worst thing is in their justification of disallowing Firefox they listed that it was not an enterprise application. I get that it might be extra effort to support it but don't list something factually untrue as a lame cop out for why you don't want to.

[-] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Was told it wouldn't be allowed because you couldn't restrict it using GPO... Until I told them they could absolutely apply those restrictions using GPO and even provided the ADMX templates.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] letsgo@lemm.ee 239 points 3 weeks ago

Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

[-] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 weeks ago

Been a loooong time

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nanook@lemm.ee 211 points 3 weeks ago

Google is not an IT company. It’s an advertising company. Surprised Pikachu, it blocks ad blockers.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 weeks ago

It's been an ad company for a long time, though, and blocking ad blockers is new.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Because they are at the end of their growth phase and have entered their squeeze until dead phase.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 86 points 3 weeks ago

But ublock origin lite is by the same dev.. Not as many features but it conforms to the new rules and is still much better than not having a blocker if you use chrome or edge.

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 3 weeks ago

Missing critical features:

Filter lists only update with the extension, you cannot update them dynamically

No making your own filters and thus no element picker for blocking annoyances on a webpage (a feature so good apple literally baked it into safari)

No support for external lists (which means if you back up your own filters into a list you cannot easily reimport)

No changing behavior on a per site basis

A number of other features as well that are more strictly power user features but still really handy like dynamic filtering and strict blocking domains.

If you have the option stop using chrome and edge, they are some of the worst options you could choose. Even outside of adblock and manifest v3 chrome is horrendous for data harvesting bullshit and edge isn’t great. If you don’t have the option because of an overzealous it dept or whatever and are forced to use it ubo lite is your best option probably and my heart goes out to you

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 65 points 3 weeks ago

Chrome is no longer available on my computer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 59 points 3 weeks ago
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 weeks ago

And if you don't like Firefox, use one of the Firefox forks. Some of them are very Chrome-like.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago

the what store now

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago
  • Chrome is no longer available in my phone, computer,...
[-] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago

I take this as a sign that it genuinely still works to block ads and hasn’t sold out and become malware like those others that used to be popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] knexcar@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago

This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 weeks ago

There's a way to save your already-installed extension, in "Manage Extensions..." Enable dev mode, then Pack Extension.

However the browser will probably just refuse to run it soon.

Vivaldi, for what it's worth, seems to still run uBlock Origin just fine. I am afraid to uninstall it now to test if it'll re-install properly.

My version: 7.1.3570.39 (Stable channel) (64-bit)

Might be time to finally move to Firefox though, if Vivaldi doesn't keep Manifest V2 support.

[-] Flagstaff@programming.dev 21 points 3 weeks ago

Vivaldi isn't even fully open-source anyway, so it's worth leaving regardless.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] g4nd41ph@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

I've started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago

never had a problem with firefox and youtube

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 24 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone should ditch chrome

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And that is why I went to Firefox once Google announced this bullshit.

Swapping is pretty painless. It even brings over all your passwords and stuff these days. Best get to swapping before Google disable that as well. They'd just love to keep you hostage.

[-] samTheSwiss@lemm.ee 26 points 3 weeks ago

Use a third party password manager, don’t rely on browser default ones

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 22 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago

I really hope some team has been following the changes in Chrome/Chromium by Google to remove Manifest v2, and has been keeping a patchset that will undo the damage? Time to make a hard fork and get some funding to try to keep it going?

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Multiple browsers have said they will keep support while the code is still there (in Chromium it's still there, only disabled for now).

When it is removed from Chromium, it's probably going to disappear for most or all major Chromium browsers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Didn't consider chrome before and still wont

[-] libra00@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I heard someone say a week or so ago that they straight disabled it in the browser, and now only the gimped version that works with Manifest V3 works now. Thankfully I switched to Firefox when all this Manifest V3 stuff was announced. As far as I know it's the only browser out there that isn't based on Chromium (which Google also controls, so browsers like Brave will likely be affected by this soon as well, unless a bunch of those smaller browsers get together and fork Chromium and maintain it themselves, which I'm not very hopeful about) and so doesn't have to worry about these shenanigans.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1263 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

68190 readers
2395 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS