1268
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 79 points 1 month ago

Cries in only Chrome and Edge at work 😢

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 month ago
[-] takeda@lemm.ee 58 points 1 month ago

Yeah. What company wouldn't allow it?

When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

[-] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 49 points 1 month ago

I would argue it's a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that's what I would mention.

[-] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

A good IT is blocking ads at a company-level. Browser extensions wouldn’t matter, and in fact, shouldn’t be allowed for the same reason.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

You can only catch so much at the edge and DNS level. Browser extension catches the stragglers that get through. But we've mitigated virtually all browser induced malware possibilities by just moving to cloud-based internet isolation. It's similar to what the DoD uses, if anyone's familiar with their use case: https://www.bylight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CBII_2020-2025.pdf

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Even with CBII ads still make the internet cancerous to even look at

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Oh for sure, but with CBII, malicious ads can't exploit a vulnerability and infect your local system.

I'm not always working in the office, and they've asked us to connect to VPN only if we need access to the internal network. Email and Teams work without VPN, but now you want me to log in for web access? A browser blocker is better imo.

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The FBI agrees with you

(Although they have since taken down their PSA woth no explanation)

[-] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I used to develop ads (non intrusive things for home depot or go RVing) and i used ad blockers. When testing, i would just run private browsing with plugins disabled...

[-] micka190@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah. What company wouldn’t allow it?

My IT department uninstalled it from my work laptop, and told me not to reinstall it because - and I quote: "The only browser IT officially supports is Google Chrome."

What makes this doubly stupid is that I'm a web developer. I literally can't test my stuff on another browser...

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 30 points 1 month ago

Officially only Edge is supported, but Chrome is tolerated. It's a full MS environment.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Same here. The worst thing is in their justification of disallowing Firefox they listed that it was not an enterprise application. I get that it might be extra effort to support it but don't list something factually untrue as a lame cop out for why you don't want to.

[-] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Was told it wouldn't be allowed because you couldn't restrict it using GPO... Until I told them they could absolutely apply those restrictions using GPO and even provided the ADMX templates.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

Click on every single ad and banner, click "I agree" on every pop-up. Make that computer hate it's life!

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago

uBlock Origin Lite does work, but it's predefined lists only. You can't use the element zapper 🙁

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

How To Get Fired 101

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

My condoleances

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago

At large organizations you're generally not allowed to download much of anything without it passing through IT security and management first. If it's a no, it will probably stay a no.

[-] Flagstaff@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago

I work for a non-profit and they are way more lenient about what we would like to install as long as the job gets done.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Then you have bad opsec and security holes.

This matters more for some industries than others. But this attitude lets a malicious employee install basically whatever they want in service of "the job" and you won't even know you're being breached until after it's all over.

[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Just remember,it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission!

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just to be clear, I mean it's literally managed at the Group Policy level (in Windows server environments at least) and no amount of asking will suddenly give your user account permissions to be able to save files of any kind.

You generally literally cannot download it without going through IT to get them to approve of and give your account access first.

[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Ya I forgot I have escalated device privileges and an admin account, which I definitely would have used for installing anything. Although I believe I can also skirt the rules using winget on a user account. That will probably get you in trouble however!

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago
[-] MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Download a Firefox based browser from the Microsoft store?

[-] RelativeArea1@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago

some "infosec" systems tags firefox as a "vulnerability" risk

ahem tenable ahem

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Wellp, time to get a new job.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 month ago

I can't install anything. I'm lucky I can install uBlock Origin because I worked out later most extensions are disabled too. But I guess it's only matter of time until that disappears.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you had uBlock origin already, you may have gotten a message through Chrome that it was no longer supported, so it's been disabled, and gives you the option to remove it. I noticed you don't have to remove it, and it can be re-enabled. However, I need someone smarter with adblockers than I to say if this is actually helpful and not hazardous.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People are saying manifest v2 (the old API that ublock uses) will be gone soon, which I think should effectively make ublock unusable whatever you do unless you stop updating chrome maybe (which could open you up to a ton of security issues) ? Not sure, don't care since I've ditched chrome long ago

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Good to know, thanks.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I would have run already.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1268 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

69451 readers
4300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS