Ladybird is certainly interesting to watch, it's improving quite quickly.
I know people on here hate it because of one (admittedly not at all nice) gender issue in the codes comments but like... seriously?
Any details on that comment? Curious...
I'll give my take on it. Something many fail to grasp is that it's not about a singular thing, you need to look at the context. Let's go through some of it:
Would I look at that PR and say I'm not touching Andreas with a ten-foot pole? Maybe that's excessive. Would I ignore all the rest and say he's just misunderstood? Hell no. For all its issues, I do hope Ladybird succeeds as a new browser engine because the internet needs more of those. But I'm not touching or otherwise supporting it unless Andreas gets his shit sorted.
Oh wow.. He seeks to be ant alt right in disguise. God damn it.
I honestly can't tell if there's a disguise. Maybe there isn't! He seems to genuinely and stubbornly believe in the apolitical-centrist stuff, which you wouldn't think him capable of since he's so intelligent when it comes to programming... but programming intelligence is not necessarily applicable anywhere else.
Unfortunately—99.999% of the time—"apolitical" just means "I haven't taken the time to consider my deeply held values and how they show through in my day-to-day life and I want to stop hearing from people who challenge my worldview," not "I would like to not have this space devolve into discussions about governance nor economics" (which is also a political statement when you consider it's a community leader saying no one is allowed to question how they govern the community).
E.g. why the fuck are pronouns "political"? Just because certain pundits have vilified anyone who uses less common ones to refer to themself? That just means any topic is potentially political, and all it takes is some asshole making the community you and your loved ones belong to part of their political agenda for your PR to be dismissed. "Sorry, that kind of usecase is common among Straight White Males™, and I don't want this project to be made unnecessarily political."
Some people have no self-reflection, and it shows when they say shit like this. Only a matter of time before Kling claims people calling him out for being rightwing "pushed" him into the rightwing (because he realized the values he aleady held aligned with theirs, but lets conveniently forget to mention that part).
So there's no issue with Andreas, just some people he's interacted with before?
It's great to hear he doesn't partake in dehumanising others for their past behaviour/statements :)
I refuse to believe a reasonable, healthy mind sees someone cheering for queerphobes and thinks there's nothing wrong with that. "He's just interacting, he doesn't do the bad things" has to be the most insane or trollish response to this, because it shows you don't understand or outright don't care about how this harms people.
By that absurd logic, if I like interacting with Nazis on the daily it's fine, so long as I don't actually pull the trigger on the jews myself. When people call me out, I'll just say I'm apolitical. That's how Andreas describes himself, by the way. Apolitical.
I'm not calling Andreas an outright Nazi, to be extra clear. If I had to take a guess, I'd say he's a right leaning "thinks he's a centrist and apolitical" person who doesn't see the harm in many of the things he supports or is otherwise sheltered from them. This seems to be a trend among self-described centrists.
What cheering?
Are you trying to convince me that making a neutral meme about a shitty person's success is equatable to supporting/being a nazi?
Maybe I'm the odd one out, and do tell me if you think that's the case, but when I can, I don't support homophobes with my wallet nor my words.
It's like voting with your wallet, but for free. Image is a tool, just like capital, and I feel that contributing to theirs is a form of (albeit minor) support. Maybe I should've used supporting, or another word. Point is, Andreas does that, and I think it's because he likes Brendan. Thinks he's great, shouldn't have joined the people decrying him for being a homophobe.
People who care about LGBT folks don't usually like homophobes, and aren't usually against decrying them. I don't think this is a good sign for Andreas. That's the kind of thing that you need to keep in mind when you see that first PR.
Are you trying to convince me that making a neutral meme about a shitty person's success is equatable to supporting/being a nazi?
No, I tried to make that clear. I actually don't get how you read it that way. Also, the meme isn't neutral when you consider how he views Eich, just like it isn't originally neutral towards Gaben and Steam when gamers use it.
The guy literally created javascript. It shouldn't be a surprise that somebody who's developing a web browser holds some amount of respect for him.
We could argue about this all day, but neither of us are Andreas, so we shouldn't be assuming his beliefs based on a few interactions on social media.
None of this should get in the way of the web browser's success anyway, because it's not relevant to the project.
What's surprising is his complete lack of care that Eich is probably still against gay marriage.
It's not just a few interactions, it's Andreas' entire attitude around these topics. You absolutely can judge people and guess their beliefs from their online actions. Connect the dots, why don't you?
I'm not "separating the art from the artist" when the artist is alive and frolicking with a homophobe. That's very much relevant to me, I see LGBT folks being harmed every day due to such indifference.
Why is ladybird chaotic good when it's not even out yet
Neither is Servo.
Chaotic good because it's an entire (almost functional) engine built from scratch, and without any corporate backing.
And is developed by a bad person.
How so? I know literally nothing about ladybird
It's a little complicated, but it doesn't look good. If you're interested, I wrote a comment about it.
I'm gonna need some names because I only recognize like, two.
Going from lawful to chaotic, good to evil, we have:
(until they get a new lead dev, Ladybird is definitely not any type of “Good”)
100%, this is either uninformed or some apologia
What's going on? I've seen this new browser engine referenced recently a decent bit but I have no info beyond 'it's new and exists'.
the lead dev is a freeze peach absolutist. he's said some ignorant shit about trans people and when people said "hey, let's adjust this language" he was like "let's not get political"
Is this really the hill you want to die on and rather have a Chromium monopoly?
Mozilla has existed for over 20 years and Chromium still has a monopoly.
I'd say that Chromium has a monopoly thanks to Mozilla.
Explain
No. Research for yourself or just blame Google and be happy.
Considering I have no fucking idea where to even start with what youre referring to, I think I'll just be happy instead of entertaining an asshole. Blocked.
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.