10
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

I feel like true neutral means:

Just watching the world burn because too lazy to care.

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

When genocide and no genocide are both too extreme, maybe a little genocide? Or a genocide far away? Or maybe killing a group that doesn't qualify the definition of genocide?

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Or maybe killing a group that doesn't qualify the definition of genocide?

yeah let's kill a group of people that is not a group of people

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Killing the rich wouldn't be genocide.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

But it would be pretty based.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Just shoot madly into a crowd with a low rate of fire. Totally ethical since it's absolutely random.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

congrats you have invented terrorism

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just kill 50% at random. Perfectly balanced

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Infynis@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

We'll kill everyone born at 1pm

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

yeah fuck those guys

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

In a strict reading, killing LGBTQ wouldn't be genocide because they aren't all related. On the other hand, they do form a (sub) culture. You can argue both ways but they technically don't tick all the boxes. So it's as bad but not jurisprudentially genocide so maybe a compromise we can convince our centrist friend of?

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

it depends how pedantic you are about the exact definition but I think (or hope) most people agree that would be genocide

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nectar45@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

To be fair "centrist" in the USA is "extremely rightwing" everywhere else, the USA is super consumed by rightwing retoric

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks McCarthy and the red scare! You did a real long-lasting number on rhetoric here in the states.

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
Turning and turning in the widening gyre   
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere   
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst   
Are full of passionate intensity.

- W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming (1919)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's important to consider all points. It's also important to analyze them and throw out the ones that are wrong, whether they're incorrect or inhumane. Blindly accepting all opinions as equally valid is stupid.

[-] Siethron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Reddit be like

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Centrists are just lazy at this point. They’re basically “I thing treating people bad is bad, but I don’t want rules and taxes either, so I’ll settle for treating people-not-me badly if I don’t have more rules and taxes.”

[-] afronaut@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

The centrists I meet have an extremely infantile view of how politics work— assuming there’s an evenly distribution of representation and power for the left and the right. The reality is that this country has always been right-leaning and is now pushing into far-right fascist territory. To be a centrist in America is essentially a European conservative.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As a rationalist I think any idea should be evaluated for at least longer than it takes to react to a meme. Ideas should be accepted or rejected on their own merits or lack thereof, and not because you notice a similarity with something clearly heroic or terrible and you want to quickly decide which way to mentally swipe so you can scroll on to the next thing in your feed. People do too much of that kind of superficial thinking. [And I'm not defending any particular political point here, I'm talking about rationality vs superficiality.]

[-] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

as a rationalist, i believe its important that we consider maybe Antactica is actually a great ice wall holding in the worlds oceans. i think we should at least evaluate that fact before making such superficial descisions.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bullshit

I'm a centrist

The Israeli government and Hamas leadership should both be put in front of a wall and shot

Trump is a lying narcissistic sack of shit, just like Elmo Musk

None of that should be on any political side, those are obviously human choices

[-] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh my. An actual centrist and not a far-right nutjob claiming it to seem intellectually superior. What a sight for sore eyes

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Driving 3 million people into a concentration camp and restricting food, water, and medicine is with the intention to ethnically cleanse them is bad, but have you considered that using violence to escape that concentration camp is also bad?

[-] admin@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

They forget that centrists don't mean being in the middle of each extreme. If one side is calling for genocide and the other is calling for the prosecution of those advocating for genocide, a centrist perspective isn't about endorsing a little bit of genocide or putting a few people in prison.

Instead, it involves investigating how we reached a situation where people are calling for genocide, apprehending the group that could actually commit genocide, and dismantling the institutions that made it possible for people to join that group. This process is resource-intensive and often anticlimactic.

You don't win by persecuting people, you win by making it difficult to commit crimes. It is a slow process that requires swift action.

The left's search for idealism is what doomed them in the 2024 election.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

You don't win by persecuting people, you win by making it difficult to commit crimes.

Well provided you accept that you need to prosecute the people who've already committed crimes. You can't just go ooh well it's society's fault so let them be

[-] admin@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Of course you have to prosecute criminals, what is an alternative for that?

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Making them president, apparently

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If one side is calling for genocide and the other is calling for the prosecution of those advocating for genocide, a centrist perspective isn't about endorsing a little bit of genocide or putting a few people in prison.

This is not the situation. Both the fascist Republican and the Democratic Party, that's supposed to be the opposition to Fascism, unconditionally supported arming a state that has not only been committing genocide for over 15 months, but has committed ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and settler colonialism for over 76 years.

Instead, it involves investigating how we reached a situation where people are calling for genocide, apprehending the group that could actually commit genocide, and dismantling the institutions that made it possible for people to join that group. This process is resource-intensive and often anticlimactic.

This is an incredibly far left position to the Democratic Party, which denounced the ICC arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant and the ICJ case against Israel. Nor is it anticlimactic when we know genocide is already underway because of how incredibly well documented it has been.

The left's search for idealism is what doomed them in the 2024 election.

Do you mean the Democratic Party here? Because what doomed them is ignoring the demands of their constituents. "The Left" in the US is entirely grassroots and had no effect on the policies of the Democratic Party during the election.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
10 points (91.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

7521 readers
2842 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS